slaanesh said:Yes, I've got full keyboard support for Nanonotes. I'm working on mouse support as well for both A320 and nanonote.
slaanesh said:I think I needed a rest. I haven't touched any development for about 4 weeks now.
I'm interested again, thanks to the Pandora but I want to finish off DOSBox for the A320/Nanonote first.
I'm just in process of getting mouse emulation in.
Once this is done, I'll see what needs to be done to get to 0.74 of DOSBox as well. It's probably worth the upgrade I think too (just read the changes).
I also noticed that there is a new rootfs/kernel for the Nanonote - but I couldn't find any release documentation for it. Anyone now what's changed?
slaanesh said:That's great that it works with DOSBOX.
There's only two little problems:
1). It's probably not Nanonote compatible as it needs a new kernel.
2). To remain compatible with all users I don't want to make DOSBOX reliant on a specific kernel.
Also, I haven't had much time to do much but that should improve starting next week.
slaanesh said:Getting back into some development after a much needed break.
Who is using their Nanonote for DOSBOX?
Big improvements in the next version. I've got the following working:
* Full keyboard working (Nanonote only, obviously)
* Built in mouse support (for both Nanonote/A320)
And will also include:
* OSD keyboard for the A320 (this is what I am working on next).
* Expecting 20% faster thanks to profiling the code.
slaanesh said:I have't been following the Dingux scene much. What's the difference between the legacy kernel and the open-dingux kernel?
SiENcE said:slaanesh said:I have't been following the Dingux scene much. What's the difference between the legacy kernel and the open-dingux kernel?
open-dingux is in development. it uses a newer linux kernel as base.
it has doubbelbuffer support, uses alsa instead of oss, has nand-read support (so you can access internal nand), uses cpufreq buildin kernel to set clock and lots of other bugfixes.