Chip
[Insert Custom Title Here]
His concerns may be valid, but they've also been addressed repeatedly. The banking situation has been explained to the fullest extent that it can be, at least until all refunds are sorted out and they can't slow us up any more. The currency fluctuation situation has been explained repeatedly. All of his other points are of the unprovable, his-word-against-ours variety. If this whole thing is a scam and nobody is going to get a Pandora, how do you prove it? Conversely, if it's not a scam and everything is exactly as we've been telling you, how do we prove that? I could claim that Zeropro is actually Chad78 come back to make a nuisance of himself again, but since there is no way to prove or disprove that claim, there is no point in even making it.
Zeropro's PMs to me, full of "Do you know who I am?" and poor attempts at veiled threats leave me with no doubt at all that he is not any sort of business professional.
And no, I did not disemvowel his post by hand. There are tools for that. I think it is a perfectly reasonable punishment for trolling. If I wanted to be draconian about it, I would have simply deleted his post and permabanned him. Instead I left the post in a semi-readable format and put him on moderator review. If he wants to post something constructive, then it will get approved. But as I said, repetitive rants like this are not welcome.
Zeropro's PMs to me, full of "Do you know who I am?" and poor attempts at veiled threats leave me with no doubt at all that he is not any sort of business professional.
And no, I did not disemvowel his post by hand. There are tools for that. I think it is a perfectly reasonable punishment for trolling. If I wanted to be draconian about it, I would have simply deleted his post and permabanned him. Instead I left the post in a semi-readable format and put him on moderator review. If he wants to post something constructive, then it will get approved. But as I said, repetitive rants like this are not welcome.