xboxit
Just Photoshoppin, True, True.....
Did anyone watch this last night. That Film is Freaky, Funny and sick at the same time. But it was still good.
That Film is Freaky, Funny and sick at the same time. But it was still good.
I refused to watch it on general principal... Pretty much the whole point of Anthony Burgess' book was in the last chapter. When his publishers released the book in the US they weirdly decided to omit the last chapter. The film was based on the US version of the book so also did not include the last chapter and therefore missed the entire point. Burgess said he would not have anything to do with the US version of the book or the film because of this.
Kubrik decided to end the film the way it is. I think mainly because of the outline of the film, arranged in three parts: the live, sublimation and resurrection of Alex.
The fact that a book isn't trying to be cool and make money? There's something about a good novel that a film can never emulate properly.BaDToaD posted on Mar 15 2005 at 04:15 PM said:Books are almost always better than films anyway. Your average film has so much plot and story cut it's a wonder they are worth watching at all.
I personally won't watch I Robot because the clips I have seen are nothing like the book. Once a book gets the holywood treatment it usually removes the very thing that makes the book great.
kknd_cf posted on Mar 15 2005 at 04:17 PM said:The fact that a book isn't trying to be cool and make money? There's something about a good novel that a film can never emulate properly.BaDToaD posted on Mar 15 2005 at 04:15 PM said:Books are almost always better than films anyway. Your average film has so much plot and story cut it's a wonder they are worth watching at all.
I personally won't watch I Robot because the clips I have seen are nothing like the book. Once a book gets the holywood treatment it usually removes the very thing that makes the book great.
Always looked like a shitty film to me too.LHC posted on Mar 15 2005 at 06:25 PM said:The "books are better" brigade are probably wrong in this case, because Clockwork Orange was a shitty book.
markusdragon posted on Mar 15 2005 at 05:44 PM said:The Book > The Film.
As John said, the final chapter of the book is infinitely important to the story. The actual basis of the book isn't that, no matter what you do, alex will always have criminal desires, it's that Alex will eventually grow out of his criminality, as will his son, and his son's son. It's part of human nature to have that rebellious stage, and theres nothing we can do to stop it.
Great book. Almost on par with nineteen eighty-four
You know you said you didn't like it because of the Nadsat. Well if you actually give it a chance within three pages using deductive powers of thinking it's quite easy to understand and adds a great feel to the book. The dialougue I think may be have been made so that we can perhaps understand why Alex and his "droogs" find ultra-violence and rape so normal.LHC posted on Mar 15 2005 at 05:25 PM said:The "books are better" brigade are probably wrong in this case, because Clockwork Orange was a shitty book.