Nothing good will ever come of Exophase.
- Sep 21, 2006
- Cleveland OH
M-HT said:I apologize if it sounded that way, but I didn't talk about automatic translators - and that applies to everything I said in this thread.
My original point was that my recompiler is fast because it targets single executable (instead of multiple executables). Not because it's a static recompiler instead of dynamic one.
I think that this is what needs to be driven home to some of the people pushing static over dynamic. For a single target, manual intervention job having a static recompiler to do most (not all) of the work is good. If we're talking about an emulator then it hasn't been established why static would be preferable to dynamic, all that has been established is difficulty in compatability.
But yes, it was said (not by you) that your recompiler is fast because it's static, and that's really not why.
Last edited by a moderator: