Kojote said:
I still consider the support from GPH better than from the Dingoo guys - GPH at least try to answer nowadays, while from Dingoo side you will be completly ignored.
While this may be the case, in a way it's a good thing because it means that the community has been forced to rise up and take things into their own hands. And as far as systems software goes they're doing a better job than GPH is with Wiz.
Kojote said:
My JXD 301 is cheaper than the Dingoo, a lot chaper.
How do you figure? JXD 301 cost over $120 and if it went down in price it was only because it was quickly liquidated. It was discontinued very quickly and I doubt you could very easily get one now. Dingoo only costs $80.
Kojote said:
It does GBA, Megadrive, GBC, NES and other stuff you'd expect from a "chinese PMP".
It did GBA and GBC so poorly that they weren't even worth mentioning. Dingoo does them much better and this has some chance of improving further in the future. From what I understand, the other emulators on JXD 301 weren't very good either, and it never got any notable homebrew. It was also lacking in the controls department, especially since it didn't have shoulder buttons.
Kojote said:
So you could compare it to the Dingoo.
Not very favorably.
Kojote said:
The only main problem is yet to find out how you can run your own software on it. In the beginning the information you got from Dingoo Digital as also pretty low flame.
Dingoo doesn't even make the thing, they're just a distributor. JXD 301's hardware was just as well understood and you could in fact run custom software on it, but no one cared to, partially because it wasn't a very appealing architecture (for one thing, GCC output was poor). It doesn't matter how much a company is promoting open development for a platform - in fact, GPH is only barely doing more of that than Dingoo is. The'yre no actually providing an SDK themselves and have only released source code they're legally obligated to after being badgering to do so. The fact remains, so long as the makers aren't actively working to prevent you from getting code on their product (ie Sony) and so long as there is a simple way to do so that anyone can manage w/o spending more money, it doesn't matter how much the company in question is holding your hand. The community can and will take it from there, and all of the results follow from that point onward. Some people put a lot of stock behind the spirit of a device, but let's face facts, this doesn't actually put in demand software in our hands.
Kojote said:
Well probably it's all a "taste" matter... still the quality of the Wiz is higher and the design is exclusive. It's not cloned from a GBA Micro which has been a bit oversized.
Are you kidding? They're both indiscriminate rectangular bricks ala NES controllers, that's all there is to it. The only "exclusive" design decision GPH made is the right hand d-pad like button arrangement, which as far as I'm concerned was not a good idea.
Kojote said:
You've to keep in mind that a very own design costs money and also speaks for the uniqueness. Of course GPH has to get back their investment. Also GPH has a license for the stuff they use in their machine, I doubt Dingoo Digital ever cares about copyright. They even break GPL by not releasing the sources to the emulators they ship with the device. The professionality is on a completly different level. This is why I said what I said
What do you think it is that GPH is paying for in designing Wiz that Gemei (the makers of A320, leave Dingoo out of it) has skipped out on? GPH has not put forth massive R&D here, their PCB design is practically a Magic Eyes reference board and I don't see anything special at all about the structural design. Gemei, on the other hand, puts out several different designs, and while they're not exactly breaking any new ground either at least what they do reflects more diversity and production capability. It's not as if GPH purchased licenses for any software they're using, it's just open source GPLed stuff, no different from what's on Dingoo. Speaking of which, GPH hardly shipped the device with the source made available; we only eventually got it because Orkie, who has connections with them, asked for it. But I know for a fact that they were deliberately preventing it from being distributed early on, so this isn't a mere oversight. I believe that if there wasn't someone who was in touch with GPH we probably never would have gotten it. The circumstances are a little different than with Dingoo, but you can't really call them faultless on that count. Especially since GPH has been called on this very issue in the past regarding GP2X and following the rules.
In a way I think that holding back Linux source is worse than breaking GPL on the emulators on Dingoo, because none of those emulator authors came forth to complain about it (I know I didn't give a crap). With Linux it's basically impossible not to piss off a copyright holder since there's an uncountably large number of them; the emulators were mainly few person ordeals at most.