Well to be totally honest I just couldn't be bothered to explain.x68000 posted on May 17 2006 at 10:52 AM said:if you can't put your finger on what made it more appealing, then how can you come to that judgement??
Considering the games the ps3 is showing are first-gen for the system and the games the xbox360 are showing are second-gen for the system, I think the graphics on the ps3 were obviously better than those on the xbox360. The programmers have had a lot more time with the '360 than the ps3, and the ps3 looks better. If the '360 graphics will be eventually as good as the ps3 graphics shown, I am sure the ps3 graphics will eventually be better. That doesn't mean I don't like the '360 or won't be getting one. But if I were a "graphics whore" i would definitely be buying the ps3, if I had to get a console. Overall, for graphics I would actually get a top of the line PC because in less than a year you will be able to upgrade to a graphics card that is as good as or better than the next-gen consoles.Angel posted on May 17 2006 at 03:08 PM said:I thought the PS3 was a let down. From what I saw of E3, give programmers some time and you will those graphics on the 360. I didn't see anything spectacular and mind blowing from Sony.
look for FFXIIIdavey g posted on May 17 2006 at 11:40 PM said:I'm struggling to find any screenshots of PS3 games that look any better than your typical 360 game. Could someone give me a hand here?
Edit: Actually, I can see where this would lead so how about we forget I said anything.
The fact that a battle screen is shown says otherwise.davey g posted on May 18 2006 at 05:21 PM said:Nothing leads me to believe the Final Fantasy XIII trailer was anything but pre-rendered. To me it looks blatently pre-rendered just based on the fight scene choreography. It was too complex to be in-game footage.
Of course I could be completely wrong in which case I'll eat my hat.
Yes, but it has been said that it as realtime, and usually Squenix don't lie about that.davey g posted on May 18 2006 at 07:46 PM said:Are you joking? You must have seen a target render before?
It's a part pre-rendered and a part in game as Square admitted already. What they can afford with high rez texture/poly next gen consoles is the ability to zoom into the details without disclosing ugly details. I expect to see a lot up closer camera in action games (i.e. Heavenly Sword) in the next gen games. So far, Gears of War was the only the next gen X360 game that actually pull the camera closer to the scene. Games like Too Human put camera miles away from the battle unlike their cut-scenes suggested. With small size on screen, they can cut a lot of corners in details.deadlychicken22 posted on May 18 2006 at 07:32 PM said:While I think the ps3 has better graphics, I would have to agree that the Final Fantasy XIII trailer looked pre-rendered. I thought it looked awsome, but before goity said anything I didn't even consider the possibility that it was actual game graphics. It just looked way too detailed and way too smooth to actually be running in real time.