As the title suggests- who won E3 2006 in your opinion? As far as I'm concerned, Nintendo is the winner with Microsoft at a close second. After reviewing all the coverage (I, like many others, could not attend ), it seems that Nintendo had the strongest display, mainly because most of their titles were playable. This years E3 made me believe that the Wii-mote, despite its absurd name, has a real shot at changing games as a whole and catching on like the DS. Ninty showed a lot of their flagships, but their selection was limited. Some games also seemed gimmicy and dissapointing (Red Steel and Metroid IMO; it seems like they need more control tweaks if these are going to be as good as they hope). Also, no mention of price or a release date were given; my fondness of the Wii would evaporate if they priced it over 200. Microsoft had a strong display, but many of their games were not playable (forza, halo, others I can't remember atm). It seems that this years E3 proved that the 360 is very powerful, and can go toe-to-toe with the ps3 graphically. Also, the fact that Live will be cross-platform (btwn 360 and computes) is very promising. But where was their hd-dvd drive announcement? this makes me think the drive will be a nice chunk of change... Sony let me down. Some of the games (MGS!!!!!!!) looked fantastic, but few were playable and the ps3 has not met my expectations in terms of visuals. I realize this will be the first gen of ps3 games (as opposed to M$'s second), but still... Also, the $500 pricetag, which does not include wi-fi, HDMI output or data card inputs (as of now), is, quite frankly, mad loot. Also, where the hell was Killzone, and how could sonly so blatantly rip off ideas of their competitors!? /rant over. What do you guys think?