pubjoe
Active Member
I can't believe this discussion has just gone full circle, especially after some of the non-biased educated posts by Generalnmx, esn etc.
It's all very well pointing out the fact that a lot of the bible isn't literally true. But then, scientific records from long ago are at least as far-fetched. Just look at some of the 19th century medical beliefs.
I read that excellent document that esn linked to and yet I still don't see a 100% ruling out of the existence of God.
Please don't be so narrowminded, especially on a subject as this. It is the insulting comments that make the poster's look stupid, not what belief they have. If someone has to resort to this kind of slagging off, then they obviously don't have any credible foundation to their beliefs.
Personally, I've learn't a lot from this discussion (ignoring the pointless bashing posts). And I'm going to finally tick a box: agnostic
It's all very well pointing out the fact that a lot of the bible isn't literally true. But then, scientific records from long ago are at least as far-fetched. Just look at some of the 19th century medical beliefs.
I read that excellent document that esn linked to and yet I still don't see a 100% ruling out of the existence of God.
Please don't be so narrowminded, especially on a subject as this. It is the insulting comments that make the poster's look stupid, not what belief they have. If someone has to resort to this kind of slagging off, then they obviously don't have any credible foundation to their beliefs.
Personally, I've learn't a lot from this discussion (ignoring the pointless bashing posts). And I'm going to finally tick a box: agnostic