i've used awesome before, and i'm using i3 right now. certain things on awesome were better (new window locations were better ootb), and certain things on i3 are better (multi-monitor support, can switch to low-res screen without errors). i kinda want something in between, something minimalistic, which doesn't even use a panel, so i can pop one of my own choosing in there.
I don't know if I have heard of evilwm (although I have looked into a variety), but I find the name to be suitable. Think about it: DragonBox Pyra, running Debian with evilwm, made by EvilDragon (and others).i've used awesome before, and i'm using i3 right now. certain things on awesome were better (new window locations were better ootb), and certain things on i3 are better (multi-monitor support, can switch to low-res screen without errors). i kinda want something in between, something minimalistic, which doesn't even use a panel, so i can pop one of my own choosing in there.
Maybe you should take a look at evilwm, but i think thats too minimalistic for you. And because the Pyra will have Ctrl and Alt on the Shoulder buttons, evilwm will be my WM of choice.
I was interested in ratpoison due to it being focused on keyboard use.
Is xfce the right choice by default though? Why not prefer openbox instead?
familiarity for Pandora users perhaps?, what can openbox do that others can't?
Maybe, but I still run idle on the devboard at ~100MBs, about 78MB on first boot with XFCE4 to me that's still fairly lightweight.familiarity for Pandora users perhaps?, what can openbox do that others can't?
lightweightness that something xfce lost along the lines
How does KDE Plasma 5 run ? Looks really good and I think it will be on my first definitive Linux PC.
Openbox runs on twice less the RAM, and runs about twice faster as well.Maybe, but I still run idle on the devboard at ~100MBs, about 78MB on first boot with XFCE4 to me that's still fairly lightweight.familiarity for Pandora users perhaps?, what can openbox do that others can't?
lightweightness that something xfce lost along the lines
Without tweaking it looks like ass too... Maybe someone can come up with a nice default layout for it...Openbox runs on twice less the RAM, and runs about twice faster as well.Maybe, but I still run idle on the devboard at ~100MBs, about 78MB on first boot with XFCE4 to me that's still fairly lightweight.familiarity for Pandora users perhaps?, what can openbox do that others can't?
lightweightness that something xfce lost along the lines