WizardStan said:x86 uses up a lot more power for not as many instructions. And I think you are either overestimating the number of people that want to run Windows or underestimating the power of ARM Linux and what is and will be available for it in the coming months.Devin-O said:The ARM microprocessor sure seems to be nice, but with all the people had hoping they could run WINE/Windows etc on it, wouldn't it be better just to put a x86 processor into the Pandora itself? (Or is that too much for it to handle..)
Edit - Oh crap I necroposted.
Perhaps so, I just figure that despite all the possibilities Pandora has have already, wouldn't it just give even more possibilities with the x86 architecture? Maybe if it was possible to underclock (not sure if that's the right word, correct me if I am wrong) the processor, and make it require less power, then it's just thumbs up all around.
Last edited by a moderator: