Chip
[Insert Custom Title Here]
Esn said:Please replace the emulator list link with this one:
www.gp32x.de/board/index.php?showtopic=47518
Done.
Last edited by a moderator:
Esn said:Please replace the emulator list link with this one:
www.gp32x.de/board/index.php?showtopic=47518
Done.
Esn said:Thank you, Lafazar! I must say that the new "Recent Posts" format is FAR less convenient than the one in the old layout. It won't allow me to read the full post any more, just the 1st line.
Good stuffChip said:Updated all the recent post links (thanks Lafazar) and the link to the unofficial blog.
We've been told that all batches will be the same, give or take a few small changes for parts that may not be available anymore. The memory and nand will remain the same.Painguy said:Is Pandora ever gonna undergo mass production or is it going to continue to be in released in batches. Im kinda confused regarding the batch release system. Apparently the second batch is shipping with 256mb of ram instead of 128 & a larger NAND? I want to order one, but I want to know if the second batch will have 256mb or RAM. If so ill order later on. I know 128mb is perfectly enough and there is still enough space left even when running ubuntu, but id rather have 256 than 128mb. I understand if someone flames me for this post haha, its just that i keep reading that Pandora hasnt been officially released & that all these batch releases are for testers or devs only. Im new obviously and I know how people rly hate that.
i apologize for being a bother.
You misunderstood - ALL Pandoras have 256MB RAM.Painguy said:alright thanks. so no 256 mb of ram? the main site says it has 256mb of ram? w/e lol im not complaining 128 is obviously enough anyway. thx
Gruso said:You misunderstood - ALL Pandoras have 256MB RAM.Painguy said:alright thanks. so no 256 mb of ram? the main site says it has 256mb of ram? w/e lol im not complaining 128 is obviously enough anyway. thx
well... its stickied but still... i think we kinda got over the x86 vs ARM thing about 2 or so years ago.Devin-O said:The ARM microprocessor sure seems to be nice, but with all the people had hoping they could run WINE/Windows etc on it, wouldn't it be better just to put a x86 processor into the Pandora itself? (Or is that too much for it to handle..)
Edit - Oh crap I necroposted.
x86 uses up a lot more power for not as many instructions. And I think you are either overestimating the number of people that want to run Windows or underestimating the power of ARM Linux and what is and will be available for it in the coming months.Devin-O said:The ARM microprocessor sure seems to be nice, but with all the people had hoping they could run WINE/Windows etc on it, wouldn't it be better just to put a x86 processor into the Pandora itself? (Or is that too much for it to handle..)
Edit - Oh crap I necroposted.