Sleep Mode Here?


True, but if we can drop current consumption to something that means it'll last a week on a pair of nimh's, then it can't be bad :)

Hmmm, quick calculation tells me 15mA from some 2500mAh batteries would give something like 7 days usage. Anyone think it's possible to reduce the GP2X's current consumption that far?

Hmmm, the power LED probably draws about 10ma :D
 
Squidge posted on Feb 23 2006 at 09:49 PM said:
. Anyone think it's possible to reduce the GP2X's current consumption that far?
Why you just dont turn your GP off?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only reason I still have 33 seconds boottime is because I am waiting for the next "homebrew"-fw release, then I'll probably have about 10 seconds, so who cares then? ;D
I hope craigx manages to get all that good stuff into the GPH-FW too ;D
 
Shikaku posted on Mar 3 2006 at 07:59 PM said:
DRK posted on Mar 3 2006 at 01:40 PM said:
Squidge posted on Feb 23 2006 at 09:49 PM said:
. Anyone think it's possible to reduce the GP2X's current consumption that far?
Why you just dont turn your GP off?

Boot time =(

I wouldn't call 9 seconds that bad :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Squidge posted on Mar 3 2006 at 08:39 PM said:
Shikaku posted on Mar 3 2006 at 07:59 PM said:
DRK posted on Mar 3 2006 at 01:40 PM said:
Squidge posted on Feb 23 2006 at 09:49 PM said:
. Anyone think it's possible to reduce the GP2X's current consumption that far?
Why you just dont turn your GP off?

Boot time =(

I wouldn't call 9 seconds that bad :)
You will when you are dead.

Edit: I don't mean that in a creepy way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the 9 second boot time is with 3rd party firmware which locks the nand and causes some things to not even work, you shouldnt be using that as a argument, the official boot time is still around 40 seconds isnt it?
 
Meh, stuff that doesn't work is mostly stuff that is writing to nand, and they shouldn't be doing that anyway ;-P
 
Back
Top