DaveC said:
The problem is you are so arrogant that everyone that doesn't agree with you or your choices is labled a "whiner". I have seen you scold me and others for having more "r0mz" on their cards than YOU think they should have. "do you need the whole set" "why don't you just put a few on at once.. blah blah". So everyone should be like you or do things the way you want or you will attack and flame every chance you get. You make decisions for everyone about what WILL be on *our* NAND memory and won't let us choose or change the programs in the Open2X thing. You could care less about what some of us will use or not as YOU are "the decider". If you want a text reader and terminal on the NAND on open2X that is what we get. Why? because you say so. Then you have the nerve to accuse others of wanting certain things. When you do it it is OK, when others do it they are "whiners". It is time to come off of your high horse and stop scolding others because they don't agree with you always.
No, I have moaned about people having more ROM dumps than they could possibly use and still complaining about needing more space...
You have misunderstood the whole NAND thing with Open2x. You will be free to wipe whatever you want and add new things, but
I will not support it. The reason for this is simple - if I spend a lot of time crafting a working system and then try and help people who go and mess it up, I'd never got anything new done. The user NAND had to go, not just for the built in applications which I know you don't want but because I needed more space for other things like a menu (unless everybody wants to use the serial prompt to do everything, I'm happy with that
) due to the large amount of libraries I've tried to add so everybody can link dynamically.
Also, writing to the NAND is much more dangerous than you know. The NAND drivers are so flakey that every time you write to it, it brings your GP2X closer to an inevitable brick (it incorrectly marks good blocks as bad until there is not enough 'good' space left on the NAND to do anything else unless you use a program I wrote to totally blank the NAND, including the markers which clearly isn't a very desirable solution). This is why I have been recommending against downgrading from 3.0. Until this problem is solved or a viable workaround is developed, writing to the NAND under any circumstances is a bad idea.
I get irritated at you in particular because when you decide you want something, every time there is a link to it in a thread, you make your desire known very strongly. So strongly that very often, it comes off as being demanding, whether you mean it to or not. You used to complain about the PlayStation emulator being a waste of time and the developers should work on something more useful (which you have thankfully stopped now as far as I know) which also comes across as demanding. They wouldn't get such impressive results on another system purely because they wouldn't be so interested.
There is nothing wrong with expressing a desire, but it doesn't need to be repeated over and over. What's wrong with trying to get a sticky in the ideas forum with a list of systems that you feel could be better emulated?
A_SN is quite a sarcastic person, don't take everything he says literally
.
Anyway, I don't hate you as such. I just hate the fact that you go around and issuing what seems to many people (including myself) to be demands in every possible thread. If you stop doing this and try and keep it contained (and are a little politer when offering criticism), I will stop telling you off
.
TelcoLou said:
Why do they do it? The Devs I mean .... why do they create emulators?
Presumably because it's a challenge and they enjoy it (I've written a very simple emulator before and it is fun) but I know that most emulator authors (or anybody who's released stuff for that matter) don't like being told what to do
.
vaustein said:
@Orkie: You helped me with questions in the past. It was a mistake to treat you so harshly. Wanna be friends?
If you will admit that the demanding attitude of several members here is having a negative effect, then yes
.
This argument has been destined to come for a long time now, and people need to realise that if they aren't a little more careful with their words, there won't be any more emulators.