conso said:Maybe you two could agree on setting up an unstable repo as fast as possible and then decide if you want to branch into a stable repo or release (diff-based?) hotfix-packages.
I rushed too many things out now as people were always asking (and I was too tired to really pay attention what I was doing), the last thing I want to rush out would be a non-working repository that could theoretically break stuff.
torpor said:Okay - want some help testing it? I'd be willing to commit some time to this if it helps, ED.
torpor said:One thing you're testing is going to be "what happens if a new .ipk is added to the feed", right? Don't forget that when you do this, you need to re-generate the Packages file .. I hope thats obvious by now and that you have a process for this figured out .. since I imagine you are getting different bits of the system from other developers, it will be important to have pretty rigorous control over how the packages get updated ..
Anyway, will try to catch you on IRC later in the afternoon .. hope you have a nice day!
chris_c said:Will hot fix packages still be available going forward?
I would have thought lots of ipkg updates would be more wear on internal flash than less frequent complete updates with a complete flash, or is this not the case?