Looks like I'll have to push 2.0 sooner than I'd planned.
I feel like by
not consulting with the community devs who've made the popular Repo & PNDStore application, and insisting on doing everything yourself, you're putting competition ahead of collaboration and setting yourself up for an all-or-nothing venture. That is, either Pandora Apps 2.0 will succeed and you'll get all of the glory, or it will fail and you'll get all of the blame.
But do any of us care whether you get all of the glory or not? Is this important for the community? I think it's not, I think what's important for US is that we get a quality product that works. So your refusal to engage in any way with the devs who've already built a successful system, and your eagerness to make everything they've done redundant, seems to not be in the community's interest, only promoting ego and further needless splits.
Have you consulted any devs about
what they'd like to see in Pandora Apps 2.0? Or is this going to be another site that you'll have to pay someone to keep updated, because devs won't want to use it of their own free will?
P.S. Just be clear, I'm not attacking
you, I'm attacking what I understand about your ideas. Perhaps my understanding is wrong, in which case I would welcome enlightenment.