350 KB/s is fine for 802.11b, for an 802.11g capable chip I would expect 5 times that amount.craigix said:What would people take as a minimum speed?
Exophase said:So wait, MWeston is going to be replacing a resistor on the first 500 boards, by hand? Or does he have someone else to help him? Because that seems like it'd take at least a couple weeks, although it's pretty moot if it fits in with all the other assembly procedures.
How on earth do you get that figure? Even at one per minute, that'd just be 10 hours.Exophase said:So wait, MWeston is going to be replacing a resistor on the first 500 boards, by hand? Or does he have someone else to help him? Because that seems like it'd take at least a couple weeks, although it's pretty moot if it fits in with all the other assembly procedures.
Multiplex said:How on earth do you get that figure? Even at one per minute, that'd just be 10 hours.Exophase said:So wait, MWeston is going to be replacing a resistor on the first 500 boards, by hand? Or does he have someone else to help him? Because that seems like it'd take at least a couple weeks, although it's pretty moot if it fits in with all the other assembly procedures.
Dead1nside said:54Mbps is the theoretical limit. You don't get anything like that, in my experience, in real terms. However if it's a resistor change what's impeding proper and full 802.11g operation now? It's good all the boards aren't assembled then It's really good news that the issue has been found but what's stopping full speed operation then?
craigix said:What would people take as a minimum speed?