hey
To all those concerned about currency rates and such, such as the following posts.
cbp said:
I ordered with CC, and I do NOT want my order canceled.
Since the order the Canadian dollar dropped by a lot. If I get canceled I will lose about 50$ just in conversion fees. I will NOT reorder and just accept my losses and use my current ipod touch.
and
GunPei2X said:
If I can offer an opposing viewpoint, one that I'm sure 99% of you will vehemently disagree with... I'm not thrilled about paying even a dollar more than I have already paid for a Pandora. I doubt I will ever make much use of the extra RAM (nothing I plan to do will be substantially aided by it). The device was at the top of my "widget" budget already, so any extra cost tips it into the realm of "not financially sensible" for me.
I sincerely hope that currency fluctations are not too severe, or you might have one extra first batch Pandora to sell to a lucky customer
On the one hand I greatly appreciate you making this change for the first batch. It would have been a slap in the face to early adopters if it was only implemented for the second batch. Kudos for this.
On the other hand, I wish you could wait another month before switching banks, to avoid this malarky. I do understand there are circumstances which you cannot discuss which may be forcing your hand though.
Middo makes an interesting post that those concerned might want to read, I never thought about such things either.
Middo said:
For those worried about currency conversion losses etc., my understanding is that because WE (yes me included having paid with an Australian VISA card) have paid by credit cards the sum of 199 pounds that it doesnt matter what our respective dollar is worth. i.e. craigix will refund the 199 pounds that will convert to a dollar amount (actually higher than originally paid - so you will make a small profit) then as soon as possible, re-order the unit for 199 pounds so you are not out of pocket (appart from any fees that you credit card/bank may charge) The credit card percentage for both transactions will be charged to Craigix via their merchant services.
Please someone correct me if I am wrong above.
So in the end ya currency rate might not be an issue
, and remember
cragix stated the following earlier in the thread.
craigix said:
I know the exchange rates are a mess at the moment, but we will try to make it whatever you paid last time you will pay this time and any slight mismatch we hope will be made up by the fact you have 256MB + 512MB (and that's coming out of our pocket).
256MB is just too good NOT to put in the Pandora. If anyone isn't happy about this and wants to cancel their order that is of course no problem, we understand.
I'll probably write up a more detailed newsletter for this soon. Sorry for the last minute change - but we think in 6 months you will be very very pleased we did it.
I hope this resolves some of your concerns about such things.
edit
GunPei2X, I'm quite sure you will probably end up using the extra RAM at some time or another, even if you don't know it. As has been said earlier, Linux was mentioned to run faster on 256MB of RAM or something because it makes better use of it or something, I don't know to much about this though. But yea, if you surf the web then you might open more pages/tabs or open more programs without the use of any memory swapping or whatever, or maybe you will play a certain game or application that uses it one day. But yea, although I can't say for sure, I think there is a moderate to high chance that the extra memory will be made use of without you even knowing
.
another edit
I just ran into some interesting comments from this
Linux check memory usage page.
QUOTE
Michael Says:
December 6th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
Using the command free, vmstat, top all shows it uses almost 100% of the memory. But if I use the system monitor, it will show only less than 10%.
I am using CentOS 5. can anyone explain why the free, vmstat, top all displaying wrong information? Thanks.
and in response...
QUOTE
Atahan Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 7:30 am
Actualy memory is not used by application, but it is used for disk caching.
If memory is not fully utilized by kernel than it is wasted, by keeping data in cache when an application needs data again it can be provided faster.
If you want to see the memory from the perspective of application you should look at +- buffers/cache line, the free column of this line shows you the memory that can be used for applications.
In the case below my application using 2GB of memory.
# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 7973 7323 650 0 128 5152
-/+ buffers/cache: 2042 5931
Swap: 8189 40 8149
So yea, this should explain why Linux runs faster with extra RAM
, so I thinks anyhows.
cyas