i agree with you but if you have no roms , only programs how does it look ? For me i prefer put my program in the folder i want ...Tobriand said:I must say, for all that I agree with Skeezix eventually, I think the grid view would be very interesting. For instance:
- Tap on a given box --> Only entries matching that name are displayed.
- Double-tap on a box --> go to a menu listing all the existant entries for that column, select one to filter by it.
- Tap and hold for a second --> rename an entry - or if in the class menu, every entry with that name.
This *could* make navigating large lists very intuitive. Want some more snes games to be listed? Hit anything saying SNES. Want only native homebrew? Hit anything listed as such. Only interested in games by Konami? Well, do what you'd do for anything else.
Then of course there's extra tweaks like making re-naming non-destructive (if you rename an entity, it doesn't overwrite the old one, it merely augments it with a new one and sets that to the correct one - so if you find you've accidentally told it all your CPS2 games are Genesis ones, you can re-classify them at any time).
Problems with this, however are legion:
- Inability to include database files with the console as this might provide evidence that it was intended for emulation, and so potentially allow for lawsuits from disgruntled makers of the original systems.
- Time taken to scan media likely to be significant.
- The aforementioned database files may not even exist; Goodroms or similar might do the job partially, but for some systems it won't exist (e.g. scumm games).
- Interpreter Integration: roms are easy to deal with (typically one file, or a common first file extension); so are executables. Interpretted games, not so much - how is the system supposed to integrate with e.g. ScummVM or GemRB?
- Complexity of adding metadata for native executables might discourage developers from doing so, leaving it up to the user to fill the gaps.
- Everything would have to have command-line access to work with such a system (not a huge problem, but present nonetheless).
Most (all?) of those are beatable, but they certainly make things harder.
That said, I'm not a fan of pretty much everything *but* the grid view - and I suspect said rid view, whilst being (as I've stated) incredibly efficient, would look potentially cluttered, and not too pretty.
I like the idea, but I would go the other way with the catagory vs docked icons. This would make tabbing between catagories with the shoulder buttons more intuitive. Tab between catagories with L1/R1, scroll between docked icons with up/down, and scroll through the coverflow-style icons with left/right. This is ideal for quick activity selection without having to use the touchscreen, though you certainly still could use it if you prefer.chad78 said:I would prefer to have it look something like this:
Actually, it'd look much the same - except the box marked "system" would have everything listed as Pandora, and thus be a non-useful category to sort things by.Arialia said:i agree with you but if you have no roms , only programs how does it look ? For me i prefer put my program in the folder i want ...
I like. I like.chad78 said:Ask and ye shall receive. here's the Tabbed GUI.
Thanks for the compliment.Tobriand said:On another note, that tabbed interface of yours looks gorgeous, Chad. It'd need some mode to move it to much much smaller icons for speed of changing. But apart from that, very pretty indeed . Especially if it's possible to create a standard such that the screenshot displayed is that of state the program was in when it was last closed - though I think that might be down to the program devs themselves... not sure.
Palm pilots have done multi-tasking with more than one app/window open on the same screen using a much smaller screen and much less powerful devices - for decades.Sphinxter said:Try to open and use 2 windows at once on a 4.3 inch display, that 7 inch eee display is not even enough real estate to make two apps usable, be a complete waste, the screen is just too small. One app at a time taking up all available space is really the only usable configuration, for that reason alone X would be wasted, not to mention how many actually usable X apps will fit in 128 megs with no swap is damn few.