BaDToaD said:
Go play Wizball on the Amiga and then play the c64 version and then tell me which has the best playability. The same goes for International Karate + and plenty of others.
Yeah, Wizball is a poor port on the Amiga. Katakis would be another example (but that is not only inferior but also completely different on the Amiga).
But IK+'s gameplay is on the Amiga just as good as on the C64 - only with better sound and graphics.
Turrican I&II are one of the best games for the C64. Incredible what Manfred Trenz pulled off on the C64 with those.
Still the experience on the Amiga-versions with much better graphics, completely smooth scrolling in every direction and Huelsbeck's music is on a whole new level.
BaDToaD said:
To dismiss spectrum and c64 games as lacking playability is just plain wrong. It took the Amiga a year or two to get the the same levels of playability as the c64 games of the time.
Fine, let's play the best of their library, too.
I just hope that in a league we wouldn't play only C64- and Speccie-games most of the time.
skeezix said:
If its popularity based it'll avoidmedium and lesser popularity machines, i worry. Ie: neverdosbox or atari st, but plenty of snes. *shrug*
Here is a suggestion to solve this problem:
1. Have a vote for the most popular systems.
=> resulting for example in: Amiga, SNES, C64, NES, Spectrum and Genesis
2. Now let's play games for these systems in a rotation with one-week voting for 2 games to be played on the next system and having two weeks playing periods (in the 2nd week voting could start for the 2 games being played on the next system, etc.).
=> for example:
Code:
| week | system | voting
==========================================================
| 1 | - | voting for 2 games to be played on Amiga
| 2 | Amiga | -
| 3 | Amiga | voting for 2 games to be played on SNES
| 4 | SNES | -
| 5 | SNES | voting for 2 games to be played on C64
| 6 | C64 | -
| 7 | C64 | voting for 2 games to be played on NES
| 8 | NES | -
...
3. In order to get to play games of other systems, too, after having played on the most popular systems we could then have a "special round" for that only games might be voted that are on different systems (not among the popular ones).
=> So one "rotation" would be 2 weeks Amiga-, then 2 weeks SNES-, then C64-, then NES-, then Spectrum-, then Genesis-games and then 2 weeks games for other systems.
An alternative could be we'd play 1 Amiga- and 1 SNES-game simultaneously for 2 weeks, then 1 C64- and 1 NES-title for the next 2 weeks and so on.
One season could consist of 2 or 3 of these rotations.
As scoring-system for the league we could use something like Formula 1's 25-18-15-12-10-8-6-4-3-2-1 or 15-12-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 or something like that.