TylerAW said:
They say Quality over Quantity now a days and all I see is Quantity when it comes to Nintendo.
Now I have no idea if you are defending Nintendo are not here but if you are I will ignore it I get enough gamers constantly remembering Nintendo in their hey day rather than Sega or Atari. I can tell you my definition of casual
Cooking Mama
Education Games for DS
I'm really sorry, but I'm afraid I don't understand this paragraph at all. Defending? Heyday? Ignoring? What on Earth?
Also, are you implying that you think that those games are made by Nintendo...?
And don't worry, I have no interest in being termed a gamer, given the connotations that have ended up going along with it these days. I come from before that was even a term that was used - when I'm from, it was "game-player", mostly.
And my definition of hardcore:
Zelda
God of War
most RPGs etc....
Indeed, and Zelda has fast become irrelevant since entering that definition rather than remaining closer to its arcade-style roots - they're looking at how the old games were made in order to identify where things have gone wrong, now.
Anyway, my definition, if you're interested, is this: Video games.
You can be amused as much as you want but why is it that I don't find the Wii or DS appealing?
I don't know. That is a subjective thing, my friend.
I'm sorry that you've not found games that you like within the very large selection of good games that are available - I've had great experiences, myself.
What do you call games like Cooking Mama?
"Not something I've tried".
I have no real view other than, "It has sold and gained a fan-base, so it must have some sort of quality.".
I hope that answers your questions.
And, everyone else, I'm sorry for the off-topic tangent.