Considering the development time, the price and the avability, of the OpenMoko, Neo900, and Pyra,
I think that I have far more trust into the Purism Team.
Their Librem line of laptops are REAL, USABLE and equiped with the CURRENT GEN hardware,
And as far as I can see they are pretty successful.
Well, building a laptop is a LOT easier than such a small handheld device.
For laptops, you don't really have space constraints, can use a standard x86 board which has tons of reference designs, etc.
It's basically layouting an existing schematic onto your PCB - without the size constraints we have on the Pyra.
However, IF they actually fund the device, it'll probably be a smoother ride than with the Pandora.
We've developed the full system with 200k EUR, with a minimum order qty of 1000.
These guys need at least $1,500,000. The phone itself is $600.
They need at LEAST 2000 phones backed, which is twice the amount the Pyra has.
With the higher order qty and lower production costs they have (no keyboard, more simple case, standard LCD with capacitive touch, etc), it would probably be the same as if we had 600k - 700k EUR ready for development.
There are multiple factors that made Pyra development that slow:
- Use as little money as possible to keep within the 200k range (otherwise I could've easily produced tons of different test PCBs to see which memory works best, etc.)
- Almost everything is custom made
- One hardware developer doing it all. That's also a payment issue. If I had a team available, it would be a lot faster and a lot more expensive.
So the Librem team has planned in enough money for a quick and proper development and production run, which is good.
On the other side though: They need a lot more backers than we do. Which could mean that it will never see the light of the day.
So both approaches are different, and both are okay. Ours is more risky, theirs ensures a smoother development if it ever happens.
[doublepost=1505743494,1505743283][/doublepost]
I'm hoping that the Pyra will have a faster CPU-board upgrade available by 2019 (Librem 5's expected release date).
Well, the i.MX8 is easily available, also for the Pyra.
But I'm not sure that's a good replacement... it certainly is powerful, but it's not meant for mobile usage as well:
https://www.nxp.com/products/microc...tualization-vision-3d-graphics-4k-video:i.MX8
It's for automotive market.
I've seen it this year at the Embedded world with one huge fan on top.
Like the OMAP5, it's build with 28nm, so it will also have heat issues with small consumer devices.
EDIT: Correction, there is one suitable for mobile usage:
https://www.nxp.com/products/microc...video-dsp-error-correcting-code-on-ddr:i.MX8X
But that one even seems to be a bit slower than the Cortex A9 though.
The i.MX6 is still Cortex A9, so probably slower than the Pyra.
[doublepost=1505743544][/doublepost]
https://puri.sm/shop/librem-5/
Looks good on the specs and features.
Well, as mentioned above: Not sure the i.MX8 is feasable and the i.MX6 is slower than the OMAP5.