I do not like wireless


Up to 1000W per meter squared in full sunlight. But the sun energy is much better for you, and yes to much can harm you. And this brings me to an interesting point as well.    I was reading were the infomation about how tuna contain mecury , well someone said that 100 years ago tuna they studyed contained the same amount as today. (Taken from book One Straw Revolution) So they hypothesized that the tuna requires an amount of posion to live. And this was at a world conference.

We proably can and need an amount of posion to live as well.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/brad-pike/2013/06/7-foods-you-eat-that-are-actually-poison/

So I would recommend limiting yourself to the bare min of poison. That way your mind is clear and healthy as can be! :lol:

I really like eating spirulina as I was reading that it helps your body to be strong aginst radiation. http://www.algaecompetition.com/projects/village-farm/

 Taken from Dr.Foxes book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eddie said:
Indeed, I think he quotes a report. But then agin, he proably dosnt reveal were it came from. And it's going to be a USA report. I'm interested to know what country saying that homosexuality is sinful is considered illegal. When used in the context of biblical knowlege, is it also illegal to own a bible there? In the USA people are allowed to disagree about things as long as there is no oppression involved. So we have http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution I forget that this is a world wide thing and I am not 100% familur with customs in other countires. And a lot of people bend the rules to their will like everyware eles.
Click to expand...
A scientific report does not matter where it comes from - Statistics are statistics, no matter if they are Swedish, Turkish or USanian, at least as long as they are collected and analyzed in generally accepted ways - I.e. follows the definition of being statistics. However, the reason he won't reveal where the report is from is because it is a made-up thing. It does not exist. It is, as we say, a lie. This guy is lying to you.

In most civilized countries, religion is not mixed up with the government. That is, whether you believe that "Homosexuality is sinful" or not should have no effect on whether it is legal. You can say that you believe that, and whilst most people will look at you with a sad, sad face, they'll let you be. Saying that it is a mental illness, an abnormity, a perversion, something that people "go back" from and whatnot, however, will not be OK. Apart from being factually wrong (in the sense that such things can be factually wrong - That is, there is a well-known psychological consensus of what a "mental illness" is, say), it is also demeaning/slanderous (You can't go around accusing people of being mentally ill willy-nilly). 

Not mixing religion and government also means that it is quite legal to own just about any book, religious or not. Why wouldn't it be? Has someone told you that this is illegal in other countries?
 
Eddie said:
What about those devices that grab the enegery out of the air and convert it back into electricity... All that power moving around even though we can't see it.

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/148247-german-student-creates-electromagnetic-harvester-that-gathers-free-electricity-from-thin-air
Click to expand...
Yes, that works, in the sense that it is possible to use that kind of techniques to harvest stray EM. However, the amounts you get are so blindingly small that it is not worth it (and, by extension, so infinitesimally small that it won't affect your body). You could build bigger constructions with higher efficiency, but the energy does not come from "everywhere" - it comes from the powerlines and transmitters, and if you started doing that on a useful scale it would both technically and legally be the same thing as connecting to the powerline with an unauthorized cable - Power would disappear, the power company would come investigate, and you'd go to jail.
 
Many things in science are copyed from nature (can list refrences here if needed). I would wonder is wave technology was not copyed from insects communicating with each other. Is seems only logicly plausable to me to state that wireless interfering with insect would be possible.

 I read studys and do test, some of them dont work out. But I know when I turn on the TV and get ad after ad after ad and watch movies with real fake science.. Well I would rather spend my time doing real science and test. To see it for myself

For example, those orgone accumlators. I read the book I quoted about the orgone energy... and according to the science in it those orgone acumulators are acutaly devices that make things worse. Yet there are tons of youtube videos agging people on to make them to "help" I read some strange things, I will admit. Are they right or wrong, I don't know. But until I know I'm not going to make one.

One guy claims to make an element turn into a lower element simply with the power of shapes. He even says how he does it. If it repeatable then he was not lying although it may not be fully understood how and why it happend. I can not help but wonder, if this is possible can I make gold? Well after doing the resurch I can, but the materials are so high on the elemntal cart that they are more expensive then the gold they would make.

The abilty to make things and use things goes not make us God's. Does shooting a gun make someone a God? I think not. It is much easyer to take life then it is to save it. Yet often people become persuaded to marvel at there own works. I always try to remember to stay humble, there is greater power at work then I.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another hint on Forum etiquette: It is generally considered bad form to go back and edit your posts and change the content in them afterwards. Fix some spelling errors? Sure. Add a new paragraph or two? Not unless it is absolutely necessary, and then you make it clear where the edited material is. Change around the original post and arguments after people have replied to them? No.
 
Eddie said:
Many things in science are copyed from nature (can list refrences here if needed). I would wonder is wave technology was not copyed from insects communicating with each other. Is seems only logicly plausable to me to state that wireless interfering with insect would be possible.
Click to expand...
Nope, it isn't. Insects does not communicate with wireless or "wave" technology. Or, at least not in that spectrum - Insects communicate by vision, of course, and light is EM radiation, but... :D  So that has nothing to do with it.  Insects die because we spread pesticides around.

Eddie said:
For example, those orgone accumlators. I read the book I quoted about the orgone energy... and according to it those orgone acumulators are acutaly devices that make things worse.
Click to expand...
The existence of books that blather about orgone energy makes things worse, by polluting peoples minds with daft made-up shit, and making them waste their monies on books and videos that lie to them.
 
Moxie said:
Eddie said:
For example, those orgone accumlators. I read the book I quoted about the orgone energy... and according to it those orgone acumulators are acutaly devices that make things worse.
Click to expand...
The existence of books that blather about orgone energy makes things worse, by polluting peoples minds with daft made-up shit, and making them waste their monies on books and videos that lie to them.
Click to expand...
That's the point of the whole "Scharlatan" business model.

People want to hear (or read) those lies to feel superior with their "secret knowledge".

Supply and demand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Humans can comunicate with radiation as well. I know insects can I talked to some before LOL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moxie said:
Another hint on Forum etiquette: It is generally considered bad form to go back and edit your posts and change the content in them afterwards. Fix some spelling errors? Sure. Add a new paragraph or two? Not unless it is absolutely necessary, and then you make it clear where the edited material is. Change around the original post and arguments after people have replied to them? No.
Click to expand...
Sorry about that, when Im typeing it does not show the post below until I refresh the page, I will try harder then. I have not gone back and changed arguments. Isnt there a log like wikipidia that shows that?
 
Moxie said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Z0_n7tGnK0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEDaCIDvj6I
Click to expand...
Kamehameha.jpg


:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eddie said:
Moxie said:
Another hint on Forum etiquette: It is generally considered bad form to go back and edit your posts and change the content in them afterwards. Fix some spelling errors? Sure. Add a new paragraph or two? Not unless it is absolutely necessary, and then you make it clear where the edited material is. Change around the original post and arguments after people have replied to them? No.
Click to expand...
Sorry about that, when Im typeing it does not show the post below until I refresh the page, I will try harder then. I have not gone back and changed arguments. Isnt there a log like wikipidia that shows that?
Click to expand...
No, you have not changed arguments. I was just sort of giving the whole badness progression :) It is generally better to make a second post if something happened after you've already pressed "POST". 

There is a log, but that is only accessible to ED, I think.
 
Eddie said:
Many things in science are copyed from nature
Click to expand...
No, science does not "copy" nature. Science seeks to understand nature. Science seeks to use nature. Science *IS* nature. If it is a real thing in nature, science will seek to understand and explain it, and if it is useful (as in the case of EM, and many many things) it will be used by mankind. If science cannot explain it, if science finds evidence that what is occurring is not natural then we are left with two choices: either it is magic and not bound by the laws of nature, or it is a lie.This is the case with those that suffer from EM radiation: science has studied it, science has found nothing that proves it is true but a great deal of evidence that suggests it is not true. That is nature: human beings are not actually affected by EM radiation. Yet people still feel sick around EM sources, even when those EM sources are themselves completely fake. So what is it? Either it is magic and there is some very unnatural force at work, something which doesn't exist in either nature or technology, that makes people feel sick around what they think are EM sources; or they have fallen into a lie, so convinced are they that this lie is true that they actually feel physical symptoms of what the lie suggests.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Cybiko. This Gadget Any Good?
Replies
7
Views
2K
extremegamer
E
L
Wireless Router For Pandora!
Replies
16
Views
5K
Milamber777
M
D
Wireless Extenders
Replies
6
Views
830
sam fisher
sam fisher
pmprog
Turn your gameboy into a wireless controller
Replies
2
Views
1K
rygD
rygD
T
A Few Wireless Questions
Replies
1
Views
995
sam fisher
sam fisher
Back
Top