Doesn't Porn = Prostituion?


Speaking for the criminaly insane i have come to the conclusion that
A.mens sexuality is strongly tied to audiovisual part of the brain
B.wimens sexulity is strongly tied to empatic,cognitive,audiovisual parts of the brain

(i will asume in my thesis that sex is the means for getting children born)
A.men chose their sexualpartners based on appearence to get the strongest offspring men dont have to screen subjects furter because they can produce offspring on the fly with many subjects

B.wimen chose their sexualpartners based on a wide range of qualities they need a strong incitament to mate and bear strong offspring becuse they are pregnant and thus not elegeble to mate in a long time

so in small words

1.porn is a sexual consumer product for humans
2.audiovisual porn is mainly targeted at men (the internet is proof of that)
3.emotional,plotdriven,audiovisual porn is targeted at wimen (jacki collins fortune is proof of that)
 
I'm not going to start into one of my rants about brain chemistry, but I suggest you get some information on the brains of both sexes, and reevaluate your idea. The only different in the sexual areas, apart from obviously and normally, targeting the opposing gender, is hormone concentration, due to menstrual cycles and what not.
 
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 12:16 PM said:
I'm not going to start into one of my rants about brain chemistry, but I suggest you get some information on the brains of both sexes, and reevaluate your idea. The only different in the sexual areas, apart from obviously and normally, targeting the opposing gender, is hormone concentration, due to menstrual cycles and what not.
samy samy samy do you think that brain chemistry dictates the brains functions.
Or do the brain dictate the chemistrys functions ?

i belive that the autonome system of the brain governs basic chemistry (that includes hormone production and is as you say different in the sexes)
but the higher level of functions gets governed by the EGO sex falls in this category

so whats gets people aroused is personal and the brain chemestry dont dictate what you like the psyche does and wimens psyche is different from mens they are to say the least more complex

my suggestion for you is to talk to wimen to better understand them
 
Last edited by a moderator:
evol posted on Oct 29 2006 at 11:33 AM said:
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 12:16 PM said:
I'm not going to start into one of my rants about brain chemistry, but I suggest you get some information on the brains of both sexes, and reevaluate your idea. The only different in the sexual areas, apart from obviously and normally, targeting the opposing gender, is hormone concentration, due to menstrual cycles and what not.
samy samy samy do you think that brain chemistry dictates the brains functions.
Or do the brain dictate the chemistrys functions ?

i belive that the autonome system of the brain governs basic chemistry (that includes hormone production and is as you say different in the sexes)
but the higher level of functions gets governed by the EGO sex falls in this category

so whats gets people aroused is personal and the brain chemestry dont dictate what you like the psyche does and wimens psyche is different from mens they are to say the least more complex

my suggestion for you is to talk to wimen to better understand them
I suggest you, 1, learn to spell women.

2, All that EGO shit is bullcrap, maybe it governs the personality yes, which makes it correctly placed, in PSCHOLOGY.

The chemistry of the brain is controlled by the DNA which codes for the primary structure of protein folding of all the peptides in the human body, the brain doesn't make the chemistry work, It can elevate certain things, Dopamine for example. Neurotransmitters, but not the ones that allow the correct formation of the brain, those are released and at a specific time, inhibited.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At least I wasn't trying to spell correctly. I mentioned that the brain could control neuro transmitter levels, however neurotransmitter chemicals are very different from hormones, neurotransitters are used to activate neurons in the brain, hormones affect the entire body.
 
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 01:39 PM said:
At least I wasn't trying to spell correctly. I mentioned that the brain could control neuro transmitter levels, however neurotransmitter chemicals are very different from hormones, neurotransitters are used to activate neurons in the brain, hormones affect the entire body.
that just strengtens the thesis

ur OWNED plz reboot samy

how do you know i tried to spell correctly ?

(fyi wimen=slang for women)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sorry for replying to such an earlier post but i thought it was kind of rude leaving the argument half-baked :)

daclassicgamingmaster posted on Oct 28 2006 at 10:13 PM said:
Ever hear of "domestic engineer" as apposed to "house keeper" or "maid"? I always lol at that :lol:

You're saying that because woman (what I'm about to say involves women ONLY), spread their legs and suck cock, they're getting "aroused"? Come on, that takes nothing other than scruples ;)

As for men:

WE. ARE. MEN!

Men are fucking retarded (no offense im a guy as well), but they get boners at hot chicks and so if the opportunity arises, they have sex and have no trouble getting it up. After all, it's these woman who do everything to arouse them in the first place, right? They pretty much sit back and get an erection, and let the games begin.

rofl, it's really not that simple. i watched a programme once (don't ask me why, biggest waste of time), basically the whole "american idol" thing except with porn. you'd think, woah, that lucky guy, getting to have sex with a willing and beautiful woman, but every single one had trouble getting it up. in front of a camera, with someone you don't know, with huge pressure to perform, it's not as simple as you say.

if it were, where would erectile dysfunctions come from? if the thought process of sex was as simple as you say, would they not exist?

also i'm pretty sure it's not as easy as you say for a woman to look genuinely aroused. i guess it depends on the style of porn, but if she doesn't, you wouldn't watch right? it would be boring.

as for prostitution... it's not really something i've thought about tbh. :lol: although the idea of a woman selling herself as just a tool for a man's pleasure isn't a pleasant one, i guess it's just one of those things; people will always be willing to do it. apparently it's the oldest occupation xD
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WarmFluffyUK posted on Oct 29 2006 at 08:04 AM said:
Speaking up for women, I would NEVER get involved in any kind of porn.
That's because there isn't much of a call for hideously ugly porn actors sorry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
evol posted on Oct 29 2006 at 12:54 PM said:
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 01:39 PM said:
At least I wasn't trying to spell correctly. I mentioned that the brain could control neuro transmitter levels, however neurotransmitter chemicals are very different from hormones, neurotransitters are used to activate neurons in the brain, hormones affect the entire body.
that just strengtens the thesis

ur OWNED plz reboot samy

how do you know i tried to spell correctly ?

(fyi wimen=slang for women)
You have no idea what you are on about, go and read about protein folding and inhibition of a proteins action, then come back.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Klown posted on Oct 29 2006 at 02:17 PM said:
WarmFluffyUK posted on Oct 29 2006 at 08:04 AM said:
Speaking up for women, I would NEVER get involved in any kind of porn.
That's because there isn't much of a call for hideously ugly porn actors sorry.
Nice try kiddo, but don't forget this isn't the Slipzone, oh and I was asked to model once so :p

P.S. Your warn level has just gone up for flaming outside the slipzone.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 05:57 PM said:
evol posted on Oct 29 2006 at 12:54 PM said:
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 01:39 PM said:
At least I wasn't trying to spell correctly. I mentioned that the brain could control neuro transmitter levels, however neurotransmitter chemicals are very different from hormones, neurotransitters are used to activate neurons in the brain, hormones affect the entire body.
that just strengtens the thesis

ur OWNED plz reboot samy

how do you know i tried to spell correctly ?

(fyi wimen=slang for women)
You have no idea what you are on about, go and read about protein folding and inhibition of a proteins action, then come back.

already read it, nothing new there for about 5 years. And its not relevant as that the psyche has a much bigger role in sexuality (and i will dedicate some of my free time from here on to bug you everytime i see fit as you seem to annoy me immensly)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Porn is Prostitution. Prostitution is: Sex for Money. Its possible to make porn for free; this is the Amateur class (where nobody gets paid to fuck, they're just doing it for fun).

But yes, if you promote porn, you are da pimp, plain and simple ..
 
subin posted on Oct 29 2006 at 08:31 AM said:
sorry for replying to such an earlier post but i thought it was kind of rude leaving the argument half-baked :)

daclassicgamingmaster posted on Oct 28 2006 at 10:13 PM said:
Ever hear of "domestic engineer" as apposed to "house keeper" or "maid"? I always lol at that :lol:

You're saying that because woman (what I'm about to say involves women ONLY), spread their legs and suck cock, they're getting "aroused"? Come on, that takes nothing other than scruples ;)

As for men:

WE. ARE. MEN!

Men are fucking retarded (no offense im a guy as well), but they get boners at hot chicks and so if the opportunity arises, they have sex and have no trouble getting it up. After all, it's these woman who do everything to arouse them in the first place, right? They pretty much sit back and get an erection, and let the games begin.

rofl, it's really not that simple. i watched a programme once (don't ask me why, biggest waste of time), basically the whole "american idol" thing except with porn. you'd think, woah, that lucky guy, getting to have sex with a willing and beautiful woman, but every single one had trouble getting it up. in front of a camera, with someone you don't know, with huge pressure to perform, it's not as simple as you say.

if it were, where would erectile dysfunctions come from? if the thought process of sex was as simple as you say, would they not exist?

also i'm pretty sure it's not as easy as you say for a woman to look genuinely aroused. i guess it depends on the style of porn, but if she doesn't, you wouldn't watch right? it would be boring.

as for prostitution... it's not really something i've thought about tbh. :lol: although the idea of a woman selling herself as just a tool for a man's pleasure isn't a pleasant one, i guess it's just one of those things; people will always be willing to do it. apparently it's the oldest occupation xD
You're saying that every guy have erectile dysfunction when they try to screw in front of the camera? Im not saying every guy can do porn, Im just saying a lot can.

btw, erectile dysfunction is a dysfunction. If a guy is shy in front of a camera, it doesnt mean he has erectile dysfunction :lol:

Please read up on it here

And no, it isnt simple for every woman to look aroused, but the people in porn have no trouble doing it. Ever hear of woman faking an orgasm? Seems like it's not as difficult as you think. You moan and groan with your legs spread, it's really not that difficult.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WarmFluffyUK posted on Oct 29 2006 at 07:08 PM said:
sam fisher posted on Oct 29 2006 at 05:05 PM said:
Lik he'll care...
Well if he does it again, I will ban him for being an idiot outside the slipzone

Those black, evil eyes scare him. I doubt they'd work for any porn-actor, either.... :ph34r:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sorry dcgm, i just realised how uninformed my post was :lol:

all i was trying to say was that perhaps there is more to the people in these films than being "sluts".
 
Back
Top