In the interest of arguing the other side:
Just today in America there were 223,365 new Covid-19 cases. The Hill notes that's "the worst it has ever been." Long-time Slashdot reader smooth wombat also highlights this quote from Robert Redfield, the director of America's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: "We are in the...
science.slashdot.org
Oh. I saw that one and doubted if I should post it here or it was too demagogic. It's probably ok. The comparison is quite striking and well written.
It's just that when you cherry pick examples you can make your numbers say almost anything.
In any case I think the message is true: COVID-19 kills a lot of people precisely because it spreads very easy AND it keeps many spreaders alive (and asymptomatic or long presymptomatic so more likely to spread).
If you should compare that to 9/11, Pearl Harbour, The Spanish Flu, contamination caused deaths, gender violence, high school shootings or traffic accidents is beyond me.
Unfortunately the progression of contagion is always exponential. Restrictions can at least reduce the basis of the exponentation. But the USA in particular seems to be heading into a disaster, and it seemed so for long now.
I have no idea whether the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine works, or how soon we'll have one that works, but even in the best case it's going to get much worse before it gets better.
And the only tool to slow it and save lives are draconian lockdowns (and, longer term, research, of course). They're also cheaper that not having them (however expensive they are).
Losing customers for some months is shit, but when they die you lose them forever, so it is worse.
and
CNN reports: U.S. Covid-19 hospitalizations hit a record high for the seventh day in a row Saturday with 108,487 patients in hospitals around the country, according to the Covid Tracking Project. And the number of Covid-19 cases reported in the United States reached more than 16 million...
news.slashdot.org
Some posts suggests an overage of deaths. My cdc post doesn't show the total number of deaths moving at all, but, obviously something is wrong here, including possibly me.
I hadn't seen this one. But I read somewhere (here?) that hospitals in some cities (in the USA, I think?) were sending people home in cases they would hospitalize them
if they weren't overwhelmed with COVID-19. They want to reserve beds for COVID-19. And eventually they'll have to decide who to let die because they can't handle them all.
"An overage of deaths" means that the older people die more than they used too, right ? Or that the proportion of old people dead / all deaths is higher than it used to be.
I can't tell you what happens with the CDC numbers. I don't know the USA or CDC well enough. I know there are governments who hide deaths.
You know the North Korea government says they haven't had any COVID-19 there. Maybe somebody wants to believe them. I read somewhere that the North Korea
government simply gave another excuse when they had to order lockdowns, so it wasn't officially because of COVID-19.
I've also read than in
Italy and
Spain the number of deaths reported were fewer than reality. But that was mostly when one reports deaths caused by COVID-19.
That's debatable, because some deaths are not tested (testing a living person may save a life, but testing a dead person is too academic to care in an emergency).
It's also debatable how many deaths for other reasons are indirectly attributable to COVID-19. At the beginning of the 1st COVID-19 wave I fell downstairs carrying luggage and
my back hurt for some weeks, but it wasn't serious enough to visit a doctor. If it wasn't for COVID-19 I might have gone, but the healthcare was overburdened and
also a potential contagion risk, so I didn't go. In my case that doesn't matter, but in some cases that was a heart attack, a symptom of something more serious that
the patient didn't guess or even if they went the capacity was not there to focus on non-urgent care that still could have prevented later deaths, so some of non COVID-19 deaths where
really caused by the healthcare stress caused by COVID-19. Then there's also the fact that if you die of COVID-19 you can't die of something else after that, so it's hard
to know how many people who died of COVID-19 would have died of something else if there wasn't COVID-19.
During lockdowns there are also fewer traffic deaths or workplace accidents and I think less delinquency in general.
But I think you didn't talk of COVID-19 caused deaths, just the total number of deaths, which should be easier to define and count. I don't know in the USA, but in other countries,
they had clearly more deaths in 2020 than previous years. I used to think governments don't lie so much on that. I mean, they can be creative on GDP or inflation, but on how many citizens died?
But I'm no longer sure. I still would recommend to somehow check for different sources and crosscheck, both for 2020 and years before COVID-19
(there's also the question of when is that, because the virus has been retrospectively found before december 2019, but I guess 2018 should be safe).
I don't know if someone has studied that for the USA. I don't know, checking numbers from a healthcare oriented service and an statistics or tax oriented service,
or from cities and states and federal agencies... I wouldn't know how to do it. It might also happen than when the federal administration changes, the new government finds
the old administration data wasn't quite precise, I don't know.