Skop posted on Jul 28 2004 at 08:41 PM said:
ok, answer me this.
In Donnie Darko it said you can go back in time if you go faster than light.
Neither the plane engine (or donnie driving into the tornado) went faster than light, for Donnie and the engine to go back before his girlfriend dies.
So how come they did? I know tornado's spin fast but this is ridiculous. :blink:
Also was Frank the spirit of the dead guy Donnie would kill in the future?
1. You CAN go back in time if you go faster than light, problem is you CAN'T go faster than light. Maybe some stuff can, like tachyons, but due to their ridiculous speed we can't detect them.
2. Donnie Darko might be a film that doesn't settle at the end, but a LOT of things do that. A lot of films have unclear endings; their purpose is to get you thinking, to educate you, to provoke discussion. Thanks to the DVD and website a lot of DD has been explained, but I think the film has too little information to understand it without checking these external sources.
Now for Skop's questions:
3. It wasn't a tornado. It was actually a wormhole, created by Donnie. Basically the only reason the engine hit his house was because it travelled back in time due to some 'corruption' in time. This creates an alternate 'tangent' universe.
Donnie is selected to have basically, super powers like channelling wormholes. You see him doing this in many scenes - they come from the chest and protrude outwards, and are made of water. He can also fly. A wormhole is created and the engine falls into the past. This creates a valid reason for the engine to have gone back in time (instead of a corruption), repairing the corruption and making the alternate universe disappear.
Frank is dead, yep. Donnie shot him in the alternative universe, which is where most of this film is set, but in the regular universe Frank is alive. This is why he is alive at the end, along with 'Gretchen'. Whoever is motivating Frank to help fix the universe is also motivating other characters - you might notice Gretchen asks Donnie about 'going back and replacing bad things with better ones' and all sorts of other things.
But I ramble on and explain badly. My suggestion (if you want this settled in your mind - I checked it within a day of watching the film just to end my confusion):
Read
http://ruinedeye.com/cd/time1.htm
and then
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net/ddfaq.htm
My new question is simple. If Frank is a legit spirit, why the hell would you show Donnie taking medication and being mentally unstable so much? Just to deliberately screw with the viewer and make him reach an assumption that makes no sense once the ending comes? The only way to explain the ending is with some completely different explanation outlined in 'the Philosophy of Time Travel' which is NEVER fully told in the film. Therefore, the film presents a story that makes no sense until you read some material outside of it, which is pretty lame.