Well, BETA implies, that you want to work torwards a RELEASE.
You shouldn't call it BETA, if you don't want to touch it ever again. The Betastate is part of a releasecycle.
The better description for stuff you are doing would be "unfinished port" or something like this.
Well, do whatever you want
I think we both made our statements clear and before we argue about definitions of words, we should stop here.
If others have opinions on this, feel free to write in here, but as said, for me it is like I said in the first post:
With your permission I will polish up some apps, that I find uselful for me and others and release them in a new pnd in the repo, if you don't bother to do so.
If everyone could agree with that, everyone should be happy.
I won't tell you to upload stuff to the repo anymore, as I have a better insight about what your intentions are.
Edit: I do try my apps in the betasection, if they are somewhat buggy or I want others to test them first, but stuff I did before, like GNUrobbo is safe to put into the news, as I know it is working.A
Also apps like beaver were in the Betasection from you, so I had a look at what was still wrong with it (writing config to nand) and fixed it. So why should I put that in beta anymore? Else it works great and it has no betastatus from the original authors.
If stuff is BETA, I mark it in the PXML for everyone to see, when they download with repo.