Its big companies, in industries that profit from surveillance, that dominate computing decisions (in adverse ways).
To an alarming degree also governmental priorities. You can have good companies, just as much as you can be responsible for your government.
There is no such right for companies, and its governments that regulate them. So if you want Pyra, you need both.
A democracy in where those who have something to lose by not doing so, have their voices heard, is the only one which has the right to live.
Big government being a bane to computing is a false dichotomy.
Open hardware and free software projects, languages, and operating systems are to great degree direct results of governmental actions or incentives.
All-though the better alternative, also subject to corruption.
Big governments dictate standards very well, because they, unlike some companies, aren't in that monopoly.
Using monopoly to forcibly surveil citizens, is ultimately on the citizens, every time. On the part of governments, making the distinction between good and bad, rather than small and big.
Which opens up the argued possibility of having no government, and thereby no governmental surveillance. Equally as non-existant as a functional, self-regulating business-world.
While there could be a paradigm shift, we will on some level regardless of intelligence always have struggle, because societies aren't inhabited by ideal citizens, nor functional to ability of a egalitarian humanity, but rather subject to the abilities of people whom lack it.
Same thing on a national level, and it cant last there either, but it influences a larger society.
America are inventors in both market regulation and surveillance, the second because its citizens don't own that government. On equal footing to that of 'consumer-power'. It only tries to react.
China is doing much better, and looses the parts its doing well in, not so much to differences, but to negative policies that arent hidden. It tries to activly rule, and steps on peoples feet.
India is again the opposite to china, having about as many problems possible, with surveillance being secondary to all of them. It cant rule, and is about as much a country as Greece is.
Edit: The countries with the biggest governmental sectors
are the most prosperous, regardless of size.
The difference being those that are dictated by companies, doing much worse. Both on the high and low end.
The limitations of bad government are known, but those of good government not.
With modern computing being crucially dependent on governmental control, and a potential abolishment of business as self-regulators with the powers it holds today, (food, education and internet supply) effectively being governmental regulators, I'd argue, to end on a glorious pun, that the pyra contributes to beneficial governmental control, in the sense that it places it in the hands of citizens.