WizardStan
Mega GP Mania
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Messages
- 16,731
... who wants to tell him?I presume this Craig guy wasn't too high up on the accountability index when the Pandora was made?
Last edited by a moderator:
... who wants to tell him?I presume this Craig guy wasn't too high up on the accountability index when the Pandora was made?
LOLWTF?Well when the Pandora first came to be he was just an unorganized eccentric that was fairly likable, some of his later actions with the Pandora project and also the ICP2 made him a bit un-popular around here... He made a few amusing videosOkay. I presume this Craig guy wasn't too high up on the accountability index when the Pandora was made?
Falling off roof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWAOQW5yGZY&list=UUIqIiuP-aB68u9shJSYk-EA#t=163
Hmm.. I can't seem to find Craig's old holiday video showing off the Pandora in the snow with Vodka and a funny looking fuzzy hat.
Nope, ED said not a single mm increase would be tolerated.I suspect the Pyra will be heavier (bigger battery) and is bigger by a mm or two in one dimension.
So it will be the same size as the Pandora! or smaller? (can't really tell in the picture)Nope, ED said not a single mm increase would be tolerated.
Same size, maybe slightly different in the angles, but pretty much the same.So it will be the same size as the Pandora! or smaller? (can't really tell in the picture)Nope, ED said not a single mm increase would be tolerated.
Not exactly true. I believe the current prototype case uses the same depth and length of the Pandora, however the width has been increased slightly to accommodate the bigger battery. ED has stated that there will be no more increase to size tolerated, however. I'm crossing my fingers hoping for any possible size reductions as the case and board revisions continue.Nope, ED said not a single mm increase would be tolerated.I suspect the Pyra will be heavier (bigger battery) and is bigger by a mm or two in one dimension.
I'd prefer a slight size increase if that gets us a better (less crammed) button layout.Not exactly true. I believe the current prototype case uses the same depth and length of the Pandora, however the width has been increased slightly to accommodate the bigger battery. ED has stated that there will be no more increase to size tolerated, however. I'm crossing my fingers hoping for any possible size reductions as the case and board revisions continue.Nope, ED said not a single mm increase would be tolerated.I suspect the Pyra will be heavier (bigger battery) and is bigger by a mm or two in one dimension.
Interesting...Craig in a nutshell:
- Instrumental in bringing the Pandora and iCP into being.
- Known for weird videos involving, tea, vodka, an ushanka, falling of the roof, jaffa-cakes and various combinations thereof
- Somehow (though incompetence, bad luck or malevolence) managed to leave OpenPandora Ltd without enough money to ship outstanding orders, which had already being outstanding for several years
- Started to organise the development of the iCP2. Delays. Financial problems. Mythical worldwide LED shortage. Cancelled.
- Has now left this community, owing large numbers of people pandoras, iControlPad(2)s and a credible explanation of what happened.
Some people would say I've been a little harsh on him here. Most probably wouldn't.
The only reason the pandora project didn't sink like a lead colander is because it got rescued by an evil dragon with a plan and some investors.
...I think you're being fairly level. And since people tend to shout at me for being too nice to craig, I expect they'll blast you, too
I actually got a bit of sad nostalgia out of that. I miss the vodka-in-snow-video and the alcoholic jaffa cake thingie. I did find the one which ends with his girlfriend filming him eating noodles with his hands at four in the morning, though.
Scary thought: Those videos where made when Craig more or less had his shit together.
And probably keeps a lot of money for himself in the process as well. See what happened with the ICP2 and the fact that nobody knows where most of the money went.starts something he's either unable to finish or can't find a way to finish.
That's definitely quite the negative light you're shining on Craig, especially since he's already proven to be not responsible and not organized.And probably keeps a lot of money for himself in the process as well. See what happened with the ICP2 and the fact that nobody knows where most of the money went.starts something he's either unable to finish or can't find a way to finish.
Look, I don't want to start the discussion again here, but he got more money that he asked, and he did not spend it on development because nothing was fully produced even in small quantities (apart from a small PCB population for prototyping). So basically, the large remainder of the money is in his hands and nobody knows what he did with it. Now, if you want to continue that conversation, please go in the "they're throwing in the towel" thread. This is not the place.Perhaps too much of the money was to fund the development rather than the manufacturing due to mismanagement of finances as well as incorrectly predicting the cost of development. Most of these independent projects have a budget that covers the bare minimum costs, so what would he have left to pocket? Change?
Look, I don't want to start the discussion again here,...
because starting a discussion of this topic is what you *almost* did. Continue.And probably keeps a lot of money for himself in the process as well. See what happened with the ICP2 and the fact that nobody knows where most of the money went.
And since no one knows what he did with the money, why dwell on it and draw conclusions like, "He fleeced us!!!" Even when other people's money's involved, there's no point in dwelling on it. It's done and over with....but he got more money that he asked, and he did not spend it on development because nothing was fully produced even in small quantities (apart from a small PCB population for prototyping). So basically, the large remainder of the money is in his hands and nobody knows what he did with it. Now, if you want to continue that conversation, please go in the "they're throwing in the towel" thread. This is not the place.
you were asking about Craig. Questions get answers.even though you did actually start this discussion, good on ya for stoppin' it I guess.
And since no one knows what he did with the money, why dwell on it and draw conclusions like, "He fleeced us!!!"
And those answers sometimes spawn more questions and the entire trivia ends up becoming a discussion. Which you weren't too keen on having, even though that non-intention was unclear at first.even though you did actually start this discussion, good on ya for stoppin' it I guess.
you were asking about Craig. Questions get answers.
Yeah, and I somehow highly doubt anyone but his ex-colleagues know him on a personal level. Then again, maybe more long-timers will happen by and force-feed me a plate of crow.And since no one knows what he did with the money, why dwell on it and draw conclusions like, "He fleeced us!!!"
Clearly you don't know the guy enough. You're still new here, I don't blame you.