moz
load *,8,1
just found a 500Mhz(intel) laptop in my garage, which snes emu would run the best on it? OS is XP but can change it if required to Freebsd or if i really have to linux
I've been turning to Snes9X lately, because it's still being updated and has better windows compatibility than Zsnes... I hate the fact that you have to ALT TAB or press escape to get your mouse pointer back :/ that could be just me thoughErnest posted on May 23 2004 at 12:52 PM said:Yeh agreed znes is probly the best emulator ive used!
Compile the CVS for ZSNES, then you will have the latest verion.Q-Wi-Q posted on May 23 2004 at 01:46 PM said:I've been turning to Snes9X lately, because it's still being updated and has better windows compatibility than Zsnes... I hate the fact that you have to ALT TAB or press escape to get your mouse pointer back :/ that could be just me thoughErnest posted on May 23 2004 at 12:52 PM said:Yeh agreed znes is probly the best emulator ive used!
Which I could just find a laptop in my garage. Anyhoo, I agree with these guys...Znes is definately the better piece of pie.moz posted on May 23 2004 at 01:15 PM said:just found a 500Mhz(intel) laptop in my garage, which snes emu would run the best on it? OS is XP but can change it if required to Freebsd or if i really have to linux
You must be doing something seriously wrong. ZSNES is optimised with loads of ASM, where as most of SNES9x is C++. The only reason SNES9x was choosen for the GP32 ports is because its C++ and not ASM, making it highly portable, but slow in comparision. I can damn near run 2 copies of ZSNES at the same time at full speed on a PC that will barely run SNES9x.DemonStar55 posted on May 23 2004 at 05:06 PM said:I like both but I like SNESx9 better because it seems to run faster then Zsnes
but Zsnes also uses same save files as the gp32 emu....