Alright damnit, it doesn't fricken matter what COULD have been in that bottle. If you think someone should get in trouble for squirting someone with water, then clearly you're being way too sensitive. If it was acid, then he'd have a reason to be pissed off and sue. He still has the right to be pissed if he doesn't like to be squirted with water. While I think it's extremely stupid for something so trivial to piss anybody off, he still has his right to be pissed... but it doesn't change the fact that if he's gonna sue the guy over it, he's a fuckin retard. And how the law views something doesn't change its definition. Being squirted with water doesn't actually hurt anybody. As far as I'm concerned, there's no crime committed, and he has NO reason to sue. "what could have been" is irrelavent. Anybody COULD commit any crime, but that doesn't mean we should all be locked up. Facts are what matter, not what-ifs. That guy COULD have blown Tom's head off with a bazooka, but he didn't.