Go out and play within your sandbox.
I'd rather have Minecraft than some dull as dishwater StarWars rip-offGo out and play within your sandbox.
No need for a sandbox game on Pandora .
Seems like everyone is minecraft crazy.
I've watched some guy playing it and it was pretty boring.
Didn't you notice we have Freespace and Jedi Knight (soon) on the Pandora?
hahahahaha.I'd rather have Minecraft than some dull as dishwater StarWars rip-off
Go out and play within your sandbox.
No need for a sandbox game on Pandora .
Seems like everyone is minecraft crazy.
I've watched some guy playing it and it was pretty boring.
Didn't you notice we have Freespace and Jedi Knight (soon) on the Pandora?
D.
If I wouldn't despise the like button I would have actually liked that postI'd rather have Minecraft than some dull as dishwater StarWars rip-off
Go out and play within your sandbox.
No need for a sandbox game on Pandora .
Seems like everyone is minecraft crazy.
I've watched some guy playing it and it was pretty boring.
Didn't you notice we have Freespace and Jedi Knight (soon) on the Pandora?
D.
I can see someone that has no imagination! How did Lego work out for you, btw?Sandboxes get boring without objectives
Lego is great.I can see someone that has no imagination! How did Lego work out for you, btw?Sandboxes get boring without objectives
D.
Actually, I love Lego; I could sink many more hours into that than I could into the Minecraft-esque world builders. I'm not sure why there's such a difference though.I do get your point however...I can see someone that has no imagination! How did Lego work out for you, btw?Sandboxes get boring without objectives
D.
Having thought about it a bit more, I think probably the difference is that Lego is faster - you can put bricks down more easily and you can move them around without having to erase them and start again.Actually, I love Lego; I could sink many more hours into that than I could into the Minecraft-esque world builders. I'm not sure why there's such a difference though.I do get your point however...I can see someone that has no imagination! How did Lego work out for you, btw?Sandboxes get boring without objectives
D.
Imagine combining best of boths worlds...Having thought about it a bit more, I think probably the difference is that Lego is faster - you can put bricks down more easily and you can move them around without having to erase them and start again.Actually, I love Lego; I could sink many more hours into that than I could into the Minecraft-esque world builders. I'm not sure why there's such a difference though.I can see someone that has no imagination! How did Lego work out for you, btw?Sandboxes get boring without objectives
D.
I do get your point however...
Minecraft is ace though
D.
Green should get the most, as our eyes are most sensitive to different shades of green, followed by red and then blue - The ULA+ 64 colour mode of the Sinclair Spectrum uses 3-3-2 with only a couple of bits for blue. You can't get some shades of grey, but it hardly matters - Our eyes are very poor at differentiating between shades of blue.Interesting. He uses the good old mode 0x13 I used with DOS, too.
But I have no idea, why he had the idea (which he discard fortunately) to use 3 bits for red, 2 for green and 3 for blue. If you look at the default 16 Bit mapping (5-6-5) green gets even more bits than red and blue, so maybe with 3-3-2 his basic idea had worked...