sand_man posted on Mar 18 2007 at 02:49 AM said:
You have too much time and money on your hands.
Not anymore
Dead broke.
Fishbong posted on Mar 18 2007 at 03:46 AM said:
And you have some special software/driver running on your comp that gives out a different image for each one. Is that how it works?
Must be hella awesome to have your games in real 3D, but i´d take some projectors with higher resolution. If i had the money.
Not "really" special, Nvidia has had the drivers for years. Since each eye can see a 800x640 it winds up like 1600x480 resolution
. Less pixels means the video card won't get bogged down doing a double-render. Until the 8800/8600 series from nvidia get the 3d drivers (Damn @!#$^&* Vista, 2 million lines of code for 4 drivers 32-b 64-b and DX10 and DX9, no resources to do 3D drivers) you need an expensive 512mb card with 1.x Ghz ram and that is a 7900GT/GTX 7950GTX. The 8 series do more work and a $179 8600 Ultra with 512MB of ram and 64 stream processors @500mhz will murder 7 series in benchmarks, on the leaked photo there isn't even a PCIe power cable :blink: , so it draws under 45 watts? Impressive.
Jarska333 posted on Mar 18 2007 at 07:10 AM said:
I tried nVidia's 3D drivers with plain old blue-red glasses. Didn't work too well. I'd wager shutter glasses might work better.
?? Do you mean you saw ghosts? I always see the "blue" bleeding through my red lens. I expect it is because my monitor is turning out true blue and it has some red to it, or my glasses are crap. I tried shutter glasses. ICK. They suck, the timing gets out of sync and the 3D reverses all the time, and the flickering, not good.
Steve-O posted on Mar 18 2007 at 10:28 AM said:
have you been to the 3D cinema at Disney Land Paris?? it kicks ass
Been to Disney Land CA once when I was like 5 or 6, didn't do anything.
efegea posted on Mar 18 2007 at 10:43 AM said:
I'm going to make my own DIY projector, perhaps I should make two
But it seems that on linux with nvidia drivers you only can activate the stereo on quadro cards, at least that's what I read on the readme :huh:
Wow, that is sucky, maybe the guys who hack the drivers have a way to fool the linux drivers into thinking your card is a quadro
. It is always the same silicon. The 440mx is faster at autocad than the ti4200, it is the drivers and the support for the "autocad" rendering in the core. It is amazing how stunted the 4 ti series was, didn't even have a proper movie accelerator or TV-Out integrated into the chip like the MX series.
charlieb posted on Mar 18 2007 at 01:00 PM said:
I remember reading about this idea quite a while ago and one of the big issues with it is that modern projection screens are designed to scatter the light that hits it because the image won't get bright reflection spots. The problem with this is that it will disrupt the polarisation of your two projected images. Apparently old style silver screens don't have such an issue with this. I don't know if a plain white wall would suffer from this, maybe it would depend on the type of paint. Just something to bear in mind.
Thanks, I found that out, there is a guy with 2x 19" DIY Projectors in South America and he is using his wall painted silver. I guess I am going to find some silver paint and something to paint and hang on the wall.
Fishbong posted on Mar 18 2007 at 01:20 PM said:
Hm, that could turn out to be quite an issue. In the worst case you would barely see anything because the reflection surface breaks the polarisation. Have you heard of anyone doing a similar project? I wouldn´t spend all that money without knowing if it works...
Another question: Does this work with every 3D game? The old ELSA shutterglasses did only work with a handfull of games.
Not
every 3D game, but like 90% of them. NFS Carbon, Evolution GT, Oblivion (kooky water effects and obviously you need a Monster card,
7900gs OC
). If it doesn't so the 3D, I still have 2x projectors. I can game in 1600x480 and have a really wide-screen picture 12'x4'. Try D1X-Rebirth on your PC, if you edit the aspect ratio and the resolution it will run at 3072x768 (3 monitors full-screen), if I have projectors then I can stay on one video card and play more demanding games really big because there won't be a gap between the monitor screens. The beauty of super-wide-aspect games is that people aren't sneaking up on you because you now have peripheral vision.
charlieb posted on Mar 18 2007 at 01:28 PM said:
Then test the screen: shine polarized light on the screen and rotate the eye piece to see if it still/to what extent it blocks the light. You could try other screen materials like a gloss painted wall, matte walls and maybe different brands of projection screens.
Silver screen, I just am not quite sure how to buy ($xxx) or make ($xx) it, and haven't a huge bdget right now :lol:.
Vimacs posted on Mar 18 2007 at 02:32 PM said:
I read a article sometime ago on how to build a good projection screen, basicialy they just use a wood panel with linen over it and paint it white....
Yep, but silver for the polarization. And there is an anti-shine additive to keep down the hot-spots you can add to the paint. Maybe I should paint the back of my commercial screen silver? Like a 2-in one screen.
ste_167 posted on Mar 19 2007 at 07:49 AM said:
A superb project, nubie, and not over-expensive for some hopefully amazing results.
I love going to see IMAX 3d-films! Does anyone know if shutterglasses would work with a projector?
Yes and no. There are some DLP (~$1200) Projectors that go at 140hz and can be shutter-glassed. But for that price you can get 2x cheaper DLP Projectors and don't need the expensive shutter-glasses. And you will have 2 projectors.
I have never seen an Imax movie
, but I did get 2 of their DVD's from netflix once, very nice stuff. I didn't watch the one on space because Tom Cruise narrated it and he gives me crawling skin (OT I know, but he can literally drain your intellect, you get stupider and stupider as you listen, me I get filled with seething rage, he ruined Mission Impossible, but I read the book like 4 times before I saw the movie, knowing what emotions he was
SUPPOSED to be displaying really shows up how bad of an actor he is).