Why did you post again, just to say "_"?
what is it that is wrong with you? the gpl is a license, and those who use gpl covered work had better comply.Someone just bitch about GPL, then after thousands of linux zeolets trash the forums, craig'll put it up the next times he's online completely oblivious to all the frenzied zeolets we have had to slay.
It uses libmad so i guess it is GPL, the source has always been available though through request (see text file), if you want it -> craig.gp2x.de/craigAmpSource.zip
Well since it is technically GPL-ed, you wouldn't have to respect that at all if he wasn't willing to give away the source - if you have a binary of a GPL-ed program, you are entitled to the source. As it happens, it doesn't really matter because he's happy to give away the source.Sam i dont know anything about what the GPL says, and I respect craigix if he dosent want to share the sourcecode to the rest of us, its his program.
Well since it is technically GPL-ed, you wouldn't have to respect that at all if he wasn't willing to give away the source - if you have a binary of a GPL-ed program, you are entitled to the source. As it happens, it doesn't really matter because he's happy to give away the source.Sam i dont know anything about what the GPL says, and I respect craigix if he dosent want to share the sourcecode to the rest of us, its his program.
General Public License? Is it not?
Craig isn't "technically" supposed to distribute the source code, he LEGALLY has to provide the source code. (Which isn't a problem, since he's willing to anyways.)
I know, for god's sake. I was checking that I knew what the abbreviation stood for :rolleyes:General Public License? Is it not?
It's the GNU General Public License, and it's worth understanding. Craig isn't "technically" supposed to distribute the source code, he LEGALLY has to provide the source code. (Which isn't a problem, since he's willing to anyways.)
Nobody said, that. What was said is that it is technically under the GPL, not through his choice, but through the 'viral' (what I don't like ) bit of the GPL.Craig isn't "technically" supposed to distribute the source code