Squidge
Certified Guru
Do we actually have any? I'm not sure, but perhaps we should. . . Some signatures are rediculously big, and some really detract from the thread in question. I'm betting some are not popular with some people not on broadband yet either (or the ones who are, but have certain download limits)
Eg, a mostly graphical signature would have the following restrictions:
Maximum width of 320,
Maximum height of 120,
Non-animated.
Whereas a mostly textual signature would just have a limit of 5 lines of 80 characters.
If both textual and graphic are used in the same signature, then the combined size should not be much larger than the graphical limits.
I would have thought would be big enough for anyone?
Any for/against?
Eg, a mostly graphical signature would have the following restrictions:
Maximum width of 320,
Maximum height of 120,
Non-animated.
Whereas a mostly textual signature would just have a limit of 5 lines of 80 characters.
If both textual and graphic are used in the same signature, then the combined size should not be much larger than the graphical limits.
I would have thought would be big enough for anyone?
Any for/against?