Sig Showoff


(naw)mcx posted on Dec 29 2005 at 12:29 PM said:
BaDToaD posted on Dec 28 2005 at 11:39 PM said:
Half the sigs in this thread are big enough to equate to a novella or even full novel worth of text memory wise. The first website I designed was smaller than most of them and that had several pages of information.

I must admit that when surfing on my PDA via bluetooth the large sigs do piss me off.

Yes I know I can turn them off but when I'm logged in on my PC they don't bother me.
They dont bother me ...my res is 1600x1200
Stop rubbing it in asshat, I'm back to 1280*1024 now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rico posted on Dec 28 2005 at 07:11 PM said:
Hanz™ posted on Dec 27 2005 at 10:01 PM said:
Its all about presenting an image to other people.
I hope that wasn't sarcastic, as by not having a sig you are not exempt you just get the image of: (bandwidth) snob.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually at the time I had this as my sig but decided that the joke wasn't worth pissing off dozens of people:

17462ri.png
 
(naw)mcx posted on Dec 29 2005 at 12:29 PM said:
They dont bother me ...my res is 1600x1200

It's not the res it's the time it takes to download the damn things.

My PDA rescales the images nicely to my 480x320 landscape view but the bluetooth conn takes ages to download the images. I don't want to swap and change my forum config depending on what device I'm using.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rico posted on Dec 29 2005 at 05:55 PM said:
Actually at the time I had this as my sig but decided that the joke wasn't worth pissing off dozens of people:

17462ri.png

haha thats hilarious! :lol:

I love the lens flare.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top