craigix
Mega GP Mania
Pandora 1
CONFIRMED: Pandora 2 is in the works
Surely Pandora II?
Pandora 1
CONFIRMED: Pandora 2 is in the works
Dude, you're like the brother I never had now.I love one quote form the BBC on this:
. . .get the device into the hands of children who may not have access to a computer at home or would not be allowed by parents to "muck about with it".
I really think that tech savy, or at least parents that know how to use computers, is stifling children when it comes to learning real computer knowledge by trial and error. When I was a kid my parents were absolute in the dark when it came to computers and the family computer was mine and my brothers. We broke it constantly, freshly installing windows at least once a week. We learned a ton from doing that, tweaking and installing programs that broke things. Kids are not allowed to do that anymore, the computer is an important part of life for people my age with kids. The family computer can't break, it is too important and loosing things on it is a bad bad thing. A lot of families can only afford one computer and a lot of the times kids are not allowed to 'muck around' with it so they never learn anything.
This is great because they can break the OS on this thing because it is their's and it is cheap enough that any kid can have one. The HDMI port is kind of a put off, it seems a lot of budget monitors hover between HDMI and older standards and a lot of monitors from budget PCs, the kind families with only one computer own, might not have HDMI.
EDIT: I think kids now-a-days are so computer illiterate it is pathetic. There are a lot of factors; devices that are easy to use as is and can't be hacked, ipod, ipad, xbox, ps3, ect. Possibly OS's are getting too easy, even Linux is dead simple to use now. Kids not using computers and not being able to play around with them because they're so important in households now is probably the biggest, at least in my mind.
*SNIFFLE* My father would love you like a brother too.Dude, you're like the brother I never had now.I love one quote form the BBC on this:
. . .get the device into the hands of children who may not have access to a computer at home or would not be allowed by parents to "muck about with it".
I really think that tech savy, or at least parents that know how to use computers, is stifling children when it comes to learning real computer knowledge by trial and error. When I was a kid my parents were absolute in the dark when it came to computers and the family computer was mine and my brothers. We broke it constantly, freshly installing windows at least once a week. We learned a ton from doing that, tweaking and installing programs that broke things. Kids are not allowed to do that anymore, the computer is an important part of life for people my age with kids. The family computer can't break, it is too important and loosing things on it is a bad bad thing. A lot of families can only afford one computer and a lot of the times kids are not allowed to 'muck around' with it so they never learn anything.
This is great because they can break the OS on this thing because it is their's and it is cheap enough that any kid can have one. The HDMI port is kind of a put off, it seems a lot of budget monitors hover between HDMI and older standards and a lot of monitors from budget PCs, the kind families with only one computer own, might not have HDMI.
EDIT: I think kids now-a-days are so computer illiterate it is pathetic. There are a lot of factors; devices that are easy to use as is and can't be hacked, ipod, ipad, xbox, ps3, ect. Possibly OS's are getting too easy, even Linux is dead simple to use now. Kids not using computers and not being able to play around with them because they're so important in households now is probably the biggest, at least in my mind.
When I was quite a young lad, I learned about inodes when I somehow accidentally linked a directory to the root. This was in dos on a 286, so not only was there no security to keep me from doing something stupid, but this shouldn't even have been possible. Yet there I was, typing "cd star"... "cd star"... "cd star"...
"Wonder how I get rid of it." "deltree star"
Whoops.
And there was always something more rewarding about learning how something was done, and more directly telling the computer to do it, too (it was interesting to experience that again when I first figured out some things with the Linux command line, I must say).I really learned a lot in the pre-GUI days of computing.
They have a contact address on their website - they might be able to answer that.I wonder what SoC this uses. My guess is something from Rockchip or another Chinese manufacturer. At least it's not yet another Ingenic Jz4732..
That's actually a brilliant idea. You could even do it in a way so it looks like a complete normal handheld while plugged into the display/controls thing and it wouldn't need to be as small as an USB stick, you could also make it bigger and integrate a cable which you can pull out of the part to connect it to a PC.I wonder what SoC this uses. My guess is something from Rockchip or another Chinese manufacturer. At least it's not yet another Ingenic Jz4732..
It'd be kinda cool if someone did a handheld based on something like this. Where you plug the USB stick into a case that has controls, screen, speakers, battery, etc. Then of course you could upgrade the core. Or maybe the case. Or parts of the case.
Yeah I know there were some products like this but IMO not executed too well and not high volume enough to make good on the cost savings. And this would have the extra novelty of being able to unplug it from the case and into your PC for a comfy dev setup. Something where you plug it in and your OS instantly opens up its desktop in a window would be really neat.
It'd be kinda cool if someone did a handheld based on something like this. Where you plug the USB stick into a case that has controls, screen, speakers, battery, etc. Then of course you could upgrade the core. Or maybe the case. Or parts of the case.
A video out that allows better resolution and image quality than a classic TV out would be great.Would an HDMI port be necessary on Pandora 2?
If I understand the HDMI protocol correctly (which I probably don't), HDMI requires 8 lines, with the other 11 lines being superfluous features. Another option is component, which is still pretty good quality but only requires 3 lines (and ground).HDMI is a great option, it's small and already a standard, but you have to pay to put it in your device. (IIRC)
If I understand the HDMI protocol correctly (which I probably don't), HDMI requires 8 lines, with the other 11 lines being superfluous features. Another option is component, which is still pretty good quality but only requires 3 lines (and ground).
Both of these can be implemented using the EXT connector and a very simple adapter be created, just repurpose some of the GPIO lines. Can even make a control switch with a GPIO line so it can be switched between GPIO/serial and video out in software.
I was talking about a theoretical Pandora 2, using the same form factor. There's no way you could get component out of the Pandora right now.I was just wondering if it would be possible to use the EXT for component (hadn't thought of HDMI). How difficult would that be? Would it take much processor power - I mean, would it be like emulating a graphics device, or could the video signals be sent out the EXT without much overhead?