In these cases it's normally down to the "noise" those old VHS tapes are not very compressible in comparison to to compressing a clean digital signal.And looking for Christmas specials I came across a few hour long VHS dumps at 340i that are almost 2GB and I'm just "whyyyyyyyy?"
Scene groups aren't really a practical measure of what's reasonable for the majority of people though, 9000Kbps bitrate video is just as ridiculous as storing your videogame collection in 14.4MB RAR archives.Again.
Open any tracker,
and check the size of any movie from the rip groups like SPARKS or GECKOS.
I am everyday Joe when it comes to a video stuff so here is another example of "Why we need a 1G Ethernet on the Dock".
It is Christmas 2015 and you just received your brand new Pyra, 256GB SD Card, and[SIZE=13.63636302948px] shiny docking station (your Birthday is also on [/SIZE]Christmas[SIZE=13.63636302948px] ) equipped with 100M Etherenet port on it.[/SIZE]
You decided to copy 100GB of Music, Movies, All seasons of Stargate, or whatever, from your home NAS to your docked Pyra, so be sure to remember this thread as soon as the "estimated time to copy" pops on your screen and hit you in the face.
Edit: We do not have any information about the WiFi module yet, but if IEEE 802.11ac is supported, a 100M Ethernet port is practically useless.
Scene groups aren't really a practical measure of what's reasonable for the majority of people though, 9000Kbps bitrate video is just as ridiculous as storing your videogame collection in 14.4MB RAR archives.
I agree. If I buy a dock I would prefer it come with Fast Ethernet if the other option is no network connectivity. I probably wouldn't be using it for much on my local network anyway, so I won't really benefit from Gigabit. It would be nice to have Gigabit and USB 3, but if only one is available I think it is pretty simple to see which is more important to have.It doesn't mean it shouldn't belong on the dock if it's not possible to get Gigabit..
I don't agree here. For me wireless is for convenience. If I am sitting at a desk using a Pyra with a keyboard and monitor and such I see no reason to not have Ethernet as an option if the only reason to skip it is that the built in wireless is faster. Also, keep in mind that some people may not have wifi where they want to use the dock, or they may get higher speeds with the cabled connection.Edit: We do not have any information about the WiFi module yet, but if IEEE 802.11ac is supported, a 100M Ethernet port is practically useless.
Me neither. Compare wireless latency or signal quality to ethernet. Not just throughput. For games or video conferencing for example a stable low-latency signal is more important than high throughput.I don't agree here.Edit: We do not have any information about the WiFi module yet, but if IEEE 802.11ac is supported, a 100M Ethernet port is practically useless.
Because it is 5000% valid. And it will be a real shame to have a "docking station" without such essential thing as 1G Ethernet port.This argument again..
This is the only true reason to keep it. Otherwise is useless.Also, keep in mind that some people may not have wifi where they want to use the dock, or they may get higher speeds with the cabled connection.
[SIZE=13.63636302948px] [/SIZE]Compare wireless latency or signal quality to ethernet. Not just throughput. For games or video conferencing for example a stable low-latency signal is more important than high throughput.
And the question still remains (at least in my head) wether the Pyra will be able to use a 1GB to full capacity - and I'm not talking about SD-Cards specs here, but real live througput rates the system is able to deliver.Because it is 5000% valid. And it will be a real shame to have a "docking station" without such essential thing as 1G Ethernet port.This argument again..
IBM 62P4551 from 2003 is having a 1G Ethernet on it WTF !?!?!.
It should be capable. On other hand, I do not have the hardware in order to test it.And the question still remains (at least in my head) wether the Pyra will be able to use a 1GB to full capacity - and I'm not talking about SD-Cards specs here, but real live througput rates the system is able to deliver.
I honestly have no idea how to interpret that. It's a valid difference between 100M ethernet and any current WLAN solution. Just that difference makes 100M ethernet not "practically useless". It might not give better throughput but it DOES provide other advantages, such as the ones mentioned. The only thing 1G ethernet provides over 100M is better maximum throughput.Dude, Come on.Compare wireless latency or signal quality to ethernet. Not just throughput. For games or video conferencing for example a stable low-latency signal is more important than high throughput.
I honestly have no idea how to interpret that. It's a valid difference between 100M ethernet and any current WLAN solution. Just that difference makes 100M ethernet not "practically useless". It might not give better throughput but it DOES provide other advantages, such as the ones mentioned. The only thing 1G ethernet provides over 100M is better maximum throughput. There's a good reason why for example Nintendo recommends using the 100M wii ethernet adapter for competitive online smash bros and it's not the time it takes to transfer a large file.
they may get higher speeds with the cabled connection.
So we already have an example of what I was saying with a potential Pyra buyer.Also lots of people don't have state of the art W-LAN base stations (I'm sure mine can't do 100M), but practically everyone will have at least 100M ethernet.