So You're really in a point that i was when trying to push ITB as a real ezine. It seems that no mater what different ideas will be for ITB [whether mine, old "wait and see approach, and then restart dev", or your fresh look and organizing, and pushing everybody] it will stays the same way: ITB will stay with lack of good articles
Yes, we both wanted an ezine, and yes, it suffers from a lack of articles. Most people I quizzed said put down two comments: They didn't have a lot of time, and they weren't "authors". The former we'll never fix, the latter is why I (and/or any other editors) are here.
This next bit is going to make me sound like a complete b*****d, so I'm sorry if I offend you, but I'm going to say it anyway.
There was a massive difference between your approach and mine. You threw the idea out and said "make this", you ignored my requests for additional information, and complained that nobody was willing.
The trouble is this community isn't full of jounalists or authors, and it takes effort convincing people to submit something even if they don't think it's "good enough". It can always be made good enough, but only if you can get them past the first hurdle and write something to start with.
I gave everybody a clear specification (okay, some didn't even follow it, but as the editor, I fixed it up), and some dates. I prodded a few people who might not have been following the thread, convinced people to try regardless of their writting ability, offered my assistance, and I got 4 people (other than myself) to commit and write articles, and we published an issue.
Sure, it's not going to be stocked on the shelves at your local newsagent, but it happened, people enjoyed reading it, and I can't speak for the others, but I'm proud of what we accomplished.
Im just seeing this as a waste of my time.
It's a shame, 45 interested people is quite a good number for a community of this size IMO.