iprice
Certified Guru
Well, IGN didn't hink much of the movie - http://uk.ign.com/articles/2015/07/22/pixels-review
If you don't care about the characterisations or plot, what are you reading a review for? The only thing that review says other than that the characterisation and plot is lacking is that it has a well utilised soundtrack. Unless you're particularly interested in that, I'd have thought the trailer would be more than enough for you to know whether you need to see it or not.I, for one, will watch any old crap simply for a chance to turn off my brain for a couple of hours. At least this particular crap is vaguely relevant to my interests! Tearing it apart as if it were supposed to be some visual masterpiece is like slating salt & vinegar crisps for not being caviar.
But this one for sure is, because it has Adam Sandler in it.Zohan was not that bad imho. ^^"I am just curious what everyone thinks about this film.
http://www.pixels-movie.com/site/
I will probably see it eventually, but I doubt I will really enjoy it.
With Adam Sandler in it, there's a good statistical chance that it's going to be a turd. (judging from everything he played in before).
OMG, greatest review EVER!Also, this guy didn't much like the movie
Warning: Contains profanity. Just a bit.
I'm talking about movie reviews in which movie reviewers give their opinions on the movie. You're comparing that to a waitress giving you facts about the meal. That's not a valid comparison.Well the waitress could tell you "don't eat the chicken salad, it is literally made of shit". Or more likely she could say something like "I wouldn't recommend the chicken salad today, the chicken was freezer burnt and very dry". Doesn't matter what your mutual tastes are, there are just some things which are universal enough that they serve as indicators. Some people don't care if their chicken is a little dry, some people actually like "stupid" humor, but a good review will at least let you know that that's what to expect.
That being said, a lot of reviews are absolute rubbish.
Well the waitress could tell you "don't eat the chicken salad, it is literally made of shit". Or more likely she could say something like "I wouldn't recommend the chicken salad today, the chicken was freezer burnt and very dry". Doesn't matter what your mutual tastes are, there are just some things which are universal enough that they serve as indicators. Some people don't care if their chicken is a little dry, some people actually like "stupid" humor, but a good review will at least let you know that that's what to expect.
That being said, a lot of reviews are absolute rubbish.
Well yes. You said "movie reviews", an all encompassing label. I was clarifying that "movie reviews" are just as good as "waitress reviews" in that they can be used to provide information about the product. I even followed up with "most reviews are rubbish" to make it obvious that we are on the same page.I'm talking about movie reviews in which movie reviewers give their opinions on the movie. You're comparing that to a waitress giving you facts about the meal. That's not a valid comparison.
No, sorry, I was looking for the term "dumb comedy", not "stupid humor". My mistake. I was referring to the genre, not a reviewers opinion as to whether the jokes were "smart" or "stupid".If a movie reviewer says it's "stupid" humor", that's still his opinion