Squidge
Certified Guru
Dutch_Cap said:
Last edited by a moderator:
Dutch_Cap said:
Whoa! How does that work? They must have to extract the bz2 first... but that would wreck the whole reason it's compressed. *confussled*Squidge said:.tar.bz2 has already been done
King_Qonmp said:How about .px?
Or just .x? (one letter extensions save memory !!!, 100% of experts agree*)
Yeah, It`s Part eXchange. :rolleyes:Game_over said:isn't .px an established format for other use?
bufalo_1973 said:There's a solution (well, many):
Explore2fs
Ext2 Installable File System For Windows
ext2fsd
Crossmeta
As you can see, it's not a problem reading ext2 FS on Windows. And with the last link, ext3, ReiserFS and XFS too.
That covers windows, but what about other devices - cameras, PDAs, PMPs, etc?
I'm not saying that a significantly superior FS wouldn't make it worthwhile to drop the universal compatability that comes with FAT32, I'm just saying you need to take all that into consideration. FAT32 just plain works out of the box with any device that uses SD cards. What is so great about these alternative file systems that make it worth the difficulty (impossibility for some devices) of changing?
Back on the original topic: Why on earth would anybody want to eliminate file extensions? Do the extra three characters really bother people? Are you suggesting that we eliminate all extensions (like dummy mode in windows), or just for executables? Either way you would really be crippling your ability to determine what the contents of a given directory actually are.