PoisonedV said:
I hate that shit- design people always using macs. It says less about macs and more about designers being dumb, they act like trend setters but really the fact that they all proclaim they use mac for its superior design is bullshit. None of the build in mac programs are suitable for professional design, there are nowhere near as many 3D design programs, the Adobe suite is on Windows, along with almost all other professional-grade application suites, more open source design software is on windows and linux, etc etc
(also I stated earlier I hate games journalism- even the comments on dcemu are apallingly bad. I expected better. i have no problem criticizing the pandora and do it almost the most frequently of many of the buyers, but offering dumb criticisms without knowledge and other stuff really makes you look like a cunt. Also, the first reply talks about running windows xp and farcry on it... that sets the stage for the intelligence of the rest of the posts)
While I am not sure about your claims about more professional 3D/design software being available for the Mac, the claim about not enough open-source software being available on OS X is a tiny bit ridiculous. As you are well aware, OS X is a POSIX-compliant system, which means most software can be recompiled and quite easily be made to run on OS X (aside from kernel-dependent modules/utilities which generally one should not consider anyway). There are systems that offer gentoo-like (or FreeBSD like) "ports" mechanisms for compiling such software and its dependencies automatically - like macports or fink. The quality of applications on OS X seems to be quite phenomenal, especially for the smallish, independently developed ones.
Advantages over Linux: easy to use, no need to dive into package managers, native ZFS support, in addition to the things mentioned above. Think of OS X as a properly designed User Interface layer on top of *nix userland - all the benefits, none of the costs of having applications that are mostly wrappers for console utilities to edit random text-based configuration files.
Add to that the innovations in hardware and software that are becoming ever more available for Macs (multi-touch gestures, LLVM-accelerated OpenGL implementation, OpenCL support in 10.6 - just to mention some of my favourite ones) and I really have trouble seeing where people are saying that Mac is somehow worse than Windows or Linux. Sure, it's quite expensive on the one hand, but I've had more than my fair share of problems with laptop manufacturers to appreciate the hardware Apple makes.
Disclaimer: I run Gentoo (have been for 5 years) as well as OS X, mainly to test various things like KDE 4.2 for example (and while it is available for OS X, why would you need it when you have terminal and the whole desktop interface?
)
P.S. Technically, I would think that OS X is more structured than Linux in terms of its features and the API it provides (disregarding the POSIX apis) - but that is simply because the development is centralised by Apple rather than not. The upside is that it can also be technically superior (see OpenCL for example), but has much less driver support for running on non-apple hardware (if that's your thing).
MDave said:
EDIT: I mean seriously, using Maya with a fricken ONE button mouse? No mouse wheels?! Blasphemy!
Let the USB mice reign. Amen.
To be fair, that is one thing I do find annoying, but it is easily remedied... The aluminium keyboard is awesome however, not least because the keys are swappable so that you can have any physical layout you want. That and the F1-F19 :blink:
darkblu said:
wait, did i get this right - people were discussing how human hatred stems from ignorance, and then the subjects shifts toward mac bashing by people who have shown little understanding of the technology and workings behind apple's desktops (a 're-branded linux'? oh dear). wait, there was a word about this.. ah, yes - irony!
here's some food for thought for some of you: i'm a technocrat, a professional game developer, have been doing computer graphics since apple2, and have been running a mac at home for years now, along various other systems. moreover, quite a few of my friends, again, professionals who i'd say are even more technocratic in their views (again, some of them long-time game developers, and other - people i'd trust my tightest project deadline with), have chosen macs for their home desktops. so, how does that fit your little view of apple customers being 'sheep following apple'? surely, apple products come at a premium, but so do many other worthy things in life. apropos, are you so sure the things you buy are all priced right?
i frankly i don't intend to argue in defence of this or that apple technology (not all of them deserve it, anyway) and i don't care how deeply confused some of you might be, but seeing how some of you fellow pandorians are readily making clowns of yourselves on a public board, i just decided to give you a heads up. cheers!
Indeed, Mac OS X is built on top of Unix.
However, I must say this to both of you:
The Mac OS X UI is the worst UI I have ever used in my life. I would rather use Windows 3.1 than that piece of shit. I'll admit that they have decent hardware, albeit a little overpriced, but I will never compliment that UI unless it goes through a serious overhaul.
-God Ginrai