wiseguy109
Still Fresh
I'd also like to know how much this will affect the release date.
mali said:I would suggest to keep it 'secret' until Pandora is out and the pre-order for the second batch starts. That would explode like a bomb on diggRyuu said:coming out of lurking
Dont u guys think its time to update the wiki's and spread the news to sites like digg and w/e ? and ive never really understood the "NAND" the only thing i understand is it will hold the os, anything else it will be important for ?
a secret which would come in handy for the 2nd batch but i still think we should update the wiki
but then wouldnt that reduce the life of the pandora? if we are installing and removing applications from the fixed nand flash ( write/erase cycles ) or is the nand replaceable ?darkstorm said:Well, I guess it would be handy to be able to put programs on the nand instead of sdhc cards.
Chip said:This is certainly a nice upgrade. I don't think it's nearly as game-changing as some seem to make out, though. There will be few, if any programs that will run now that wouldn't have before. Some programs will surely run better now that they don't have to use swap, but the tired old stement "128MB is all you really need" was not a lie.
Woah, don't get overexcited now ;-) I think it's a pretty significant upgrade for such a small machine, especially one without dedicated video RAM. Yes, there may not be all that many programs which really need more that 128MB, but there are plenty which will make the leap from "just about runable" to properly usable.
I should think having the original list of orders and our names and addresses would be enough to sort that out, although using order numbers would definitely streamline the process.Tobriand said:I'm also another person concerned about loss of queue positions by the refund/re-order process. Is there any way to maintain them? Maybe by allowing us to add a comment in order form of our previous order-number?
If we got the 256Mb SoC, there's quite a few things that just NOW became possible once we get ES drivers...mazza558 said:Now, the question is, what can we do with 256MB that we couldn't do with 128MB?
You'd be surprised in this case. The jump will be a slight increase in watt-hours consumed, but not something that you'd probably have noticed. We'll probably still hang at just 6 hours of life at normal speeds with the new SoC update.Tobriand said:Very welcome, though I must confess to a slight concern over increased battery drain. I doubt the ram is the absolute main part of that, though, except in standby.
Chip said:This is certainly a nice upgrade. I don't think it's nearly as game-changing as some seem to make out, though. There will be few, if any programs that will run now that wouldn't have before. Some programs will surely run better now that they don't have to use swap, but the tired old stement "128MB is all you really need" was not a lie.
In a way your right it wasnt a lie when we were expecting only to applications from a simple launcher, but now that a full desktop has been shown and apparently benchmarked it there is a reason for the extra memory.
The speed of the chip and the memory that we have are the limiting factors of what we can do with this device. The highest we can get these the more this device is capable of. But of course if you just want a GP2X replacement "32 MB is all you really need".
This is good for pandora, like craig said it will extend the life of pandora before the next more powerful handheld is made. This choice moves us more from simple gaming device to umpc i think.
but then wouldnt that reduce the life of the pandora? if we are installing and removing applications from the fixed nand flash ( write/erase cycles ) or is the nand replaceable ?darkstorm said:Well, I guess it would be handy to be able to put programs on the nand instead of sdhc cards.
About 12 years ago I owned a portable CD player, one of the early models with the buffer memory to prevent skipping caused by physical shock. Turning that buffer on, which was only a mere 3 seconds, was enough to nearly halve the battery life. On crappy NiCds, it would run about 3.5-4 hours instead of nearly 6. Things have changed a lot since then though, and I doubt we'll see additional power consumption of that crazy level.Svartalf said:You'd be surprised in this case. The jump will be a slight increase in watt-hours consumed, but not something that you'd probably have noticed. We'll probably still hang at just 6 hours of life at normal speeds with the new SoC update.
It's probably because of anti-fraud measures with the varying cards, much like the PayPal purchasers found out. Some cards will not allow you to bill for goods more than 1 month in advance of providing said goods. With the Pandora, this was a pre-order with a 1-3 month window of delivery because the units' manufacturing run was being funded by the pre-order's money. Some card providers have issues with that sort of thing because they've been burned with it in the past.antheus123 said:Why some credit card orders and not all?
Can we have some more info on this please.
The Pandora is better than I expected! You're spoiling the users! I quit! Cancel my preorder! :angry:craigix said:256MB is just too good NOT to put in the Pandora. If anyone isn't happy about this and wants to cancel their order that is of course no problem, we understand.