codifies
Very Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 360
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch32-port-dev/2016-August/000406.html
...wonder if this includes JavaFX ....
...wonder if this includes JavaFX ....
Good luck to the community that will take the work because Java is such a piece of shit...
From a language design point of view, there are nice things.That said, it's a good language for students.
Java is totally unsecure (french army uses it, what a joke), multithread is horrible, performance is ugly in many areas.
That said, it's a good language for students.
The EU uses Java programs to manage subsidies too by the way.Java is totally unsecure (french army uses it, what a joke), multithread is horrible, performance is ugly in many areas.
That said, it's a good language for students.
That reminds me of a Computer Science Prof who thought that COBOL was still the most widely-used programming language simply because the whole banking business kept clinging to their ancient programs, desperately trying to find people who are still able to maintain them...BTW there's less and less new projects in Java, job recruitment is now about maintenance.
2. While very simple programming can be efficient as long as no UI or user interaction is needed (i.e. some mathematical stuff), when the program grows things worsen.
BTW there's less and less new projects in Java, job recruitment is now about maintenance.
Many of those popularity reports are largely biased by using metrics that don't really represent a programming language's popularity. For example, some process related searches on Google or questions asked at Stack Overflow - which tend to be a lot more with more complex languages and those that are often being forced onto beginners, it usually makes Java look a lot more widespread than it actually is.BTW: Java is one of the most used programming languages...
Did you actually look at the linked article and it's sources?Many of those popularity reports are largely biased by using metrics that don't really represent a programming language's popularity. For example, some process related searches on Google or questions asked at Stack Overflow - which tend to be a lot more with more complex languages and those that are often being forced onto beginners, it usually makes Java look a lot more widespread than it actually is.
Now that's the kind of statement that should ring a few alarm bells... there always is, you might not even have heard about it - including those that practically evolved from Java.There is no other language this project could have become a success-story.
Interesting that you even got that vibe, I merely aimed at criticizing those popularity reports. Java still remains within the top 5 even in the more practical oriented reports after all, just not nearly as close to the top as in others.Java is far more than just a language for students!
They did include exactly what I criticized, and I'm totally not paying for their App just to be able to remove those metrics.Did you actually look at the linked article and it's sources?
I didn't say that I don't like it. But yeah, I don't - you happy now?hmmm... simply don't use java, if you don't like it
Where exactly?They did include exactly what I criticized.
They hid it behind 2 links: http://spectrum.ieee.org/ns/IEEE_TPL_2015/methods.htmlWhere exactly?
Thanks, couldn't find that before. But that looks quite balanced to me, Google surely doesn't dominate the results.They hid it behind 2 links: http://spectrum.ieee.org/ns/IEEE_TPL_2015/methods.html