Now, the double-u comes from the time that we wrote like: Claudivs Aurelivs, and the v was a longer u ("ooh/u") sound.
But the sound for double-u is not like that at all. Isn't it time to call it double v ? vv = w ( as they are phonetically and visually more similar)
or more logically call it "why", as in: ex why zet (the American way - in return the Americans call their game Rugby and Football comes to mean what all other countries mean by football - so we can have a Fifa Football and Pro Evolution Football and Sensible Football on our game consoles)
And when that is fixed, why not write double-u as uu instead of vv? Just like the Dutch! Dutch has "uu" as a separate phonemic, a sound that does not exist in English. It resembles much the Japanese "u" and the German "ü" (although ü is a little bit shorter).
Here's some links to hear how it sounds:
Uitspraakgids: Leer hoe je huur uitspreekt in het Nederlands, Afrikaans, Vlaams met een moedertaaluitspraak. huur Engelse vertaling.
nl.forvo.com
Uitspraakgids: Leer hoe je hut uitspreekt in het Duits, Engels, Nederlands, Klingon, Zweeds, Limburgs, Afrikaans, Krim-Tataars met een moedertaaluitspraak. hut Engelse vertaling.
nl.forvo.com
English to Dutch:
Hut (as in Pizza Hut) is pronounced as if written in Dutch as "Had" ("had" in English)
Hat is pronounced as if written in Dutch as "Haet" (not a word)
Head is pronounced as if written in Dutch as "Het" ("the" in English)
Mapping sounds from one to another language is hard. Especially when you consider that there are dialects and there is not a real official pronunciation (they tried to, but different cities have different pronounciations and they all say they are the official one).