MDave said:
The PSP can handle Mario 64 pretty good, sometimes in some places its slower then fullspeed, sometimes it's too fast. The Pandora is roughly 4 times more powerful according to processor benchmarks. You do the math
Don't quote me, but I think the emulation is help along by the fact is uses similar chips, easing off the emulation.
PS1 uses the same base architecture as n64, MIPS. That runs fine on pandora, no?
It's kind of funny really. Homebrew developers struggled to get PS1 emulators working at any playable speed (until Sony made their own emulator) on the PSP. N64 emulation came further along then the homebrew variant of PS1 emualtion.
Pandora already has a fullspeed PS1 emulator (before the thing is even released!) This should be a good indicator of what to expect
The same thing happened with PC's back during the late 90's. Connectex blew everybody away with virtual Game Station for the mac and then the PC. A first gen imac can run it and most of the psx lib (233mhz g3, 32mb, 4mb (8?) ati graphics card). Of course Sony can make a great emulator for a machine they have all the schematics and documentation and years of programming it on a machine they have all the information on and years of programming it.
Personally, I'm not interested at all in N64 emulation. You can get the same boring 3d games without emulation. It's the older stuff you can't get modern.
Chris
If Sony can make a good emulator, then why can't Nintendo make less buggy emus for N64? ;P
-God Ginrai