Akuma no Houkon posted on Apr 17 2004 at 06:00 PM said:
Well maybe those in the UK loved this game, and obviously those in Japan do, they like cartoony crap (no offense, I like a bit of a it myself, but not to that large extent), but nearly all of the magazines in the US gave it pretty bad reviews, I actually canceled my subscription to the two I was getting that gave it "decent" reviews, not good mind you, but decent.
If that was reason enough to cancel for you, then you are a lot more closed-minded than I thought you are.
Now the games again... Akuma, it may be that your magazines have given Metroid Prime a bad Review. But practically the whole of Europe and Japan loved the games. I have yet to see a bad MP Review here in Germany, and I still think the game is great. And I don't care what you tell me, sequence breaking is still possible, I've done it, it works. The methods differ from the other Metroids, but it does work.
Back to the Reviews: Why are you so obsessed about them? I'm sure there are bad Reviews, why not. There will always be people that don't like certain things, there will be someone who thinks Food for Orphans is a bad idea, but frankly, why should I care about those people? I played Metroid Prime, I liked it. The Reviews did not tell me to like it, the Reviews helped me decide by describing the game. If I only liked the game because of the good Reviews, I would also like Metal Gear Solid, Splinter Cell, Wind Waker and Crystal Chronicles. Needless to say I don't. If you played the game and did not like it, too bad for you. I don't want to convert you, it's a freaking game and there are many more out there, many more that are really great (Eternal Darkness for instance). Reviews are meant to inform about the game, not help people bash/praise it. I respect your opinion (I suspect you playef the game, so your opinion is valid
), but I don't understand why you say things that basically are not true (for example sequence breaking and yes, this is a nice way of saying you are lying, maybe not intentionally, but it is wrong nonetheless).