What 3D games are you attempting to run?SomeGuy99 said:Well my original Xbox has mame, and none of the 3D games run more than 5fps or something. Pandora is roughly as powerful as an Xbox (similar cpu performance, but more RAM) from what I gather.
TylerAW said:What 3D games are you attempting to run?SomeGuy99 said:Well my original Xbox has mame, and none of the 3D games run more than 5fps or something. Pandora is roughly as powerful as an Xbox (similar cpu performance, but more RAM) from what I gather.
And yes we all know how to use Google but I don't feel like reviving a thread from January.
slaanesh said:I will very interested in porting a later version of MAME to the Pandora. MAME v0.106 is actually a pretty good base as is the older Xbox version which was MAME v0.84.
As silver said, from a pure "I just want to play the games" point of view - not gaining a lot from later versions. Well, until Raiden II is finally converted (probably my all time favourite arcade shooter).
Also the need for Cyclone and DrZ80 will probably be diminished with the Pandora. Games that used 68000 CPUs probably hit their peak with what the Wiz can already reasonably emulate. If the Pandora is 3x - 4x faster (for example) than a Wiz is there any need to emulate a game that many times faster if it already runs at 100% on the lesser hardware? I'd say probably not. But we'll see soon enough.
Prophet said:joshwaan2k said:Also do you guys think the first Tekken will be playable in MAME?
Playable... I'll guess maybe at 900Mhz but with frame skipping and no sound. You're far better off playing the PSX Tekkens (they have more features anyway) - MAME is not so good for speed.
I noticed earlier versions of MAME (That is MAME that runs on Windows) added support for games like Gauntlet Dark Legacy but than in the newer versions they removed it.Alpha2 said:What versions are the other systems using?(by which I mean portables, Pandora might have as much raw power as an xbox but I wouldnt expect coded emulators to be on exactly the same footing) I'd hope ours would catch up in a relatively short time frame if it's not already the same.
kingoddball said:Hmm.. Am I correct in thinking that most MAME (Arcade) games are on home console anyway?
For fighting games: Mortal Kombat 1 upto Ultimate MK3 is on sega mega drive. Street figher is great on SNES!
For Tekkon 1/2/3 and MK trilogy and MK4, they're on PSX.
N64 has some good games.
Sega Saturn has great games, but NO WORKING emulator for Pandora, maybe one day.
Why not (as posted above) play them on the full speed (nearly for N64) emulators for home consoles?
Elanzer said:Arcade versions are generally better all around, graphics/smoothness/sound.
MAME will be fine with what its meant for.kingoddball said:Elanzer said:Arcade versions are generally better all around, graphics/smoothness/sound.
You're most likely correct, but can I give a smart ass answer <_< ?
If MAME is slow as a dog, what's the point of the better graphics? Just play the home versions. Graphics/sound/detail may be slightly worse, but they're far more playable.
kingoddball said:Elanzer said:Arcade versions are generally better all around, graphics/smoothness/sound.
You're most likely correct, but can I give a smart ass answer <_< ?
If MAME is slow as a dog, what's the point of the better graphics? Just play the home versions. Graphics/sound/detail may be slightly worse, but they're far more playable.
TylerAW said:What 3D games are you attempting to run?SomeGuy99 said:Well my original Xbox has mame, and none of the 3D games run more than 5fps or something. Pandora is roughly as powerful as an Xbox (similar cpu performance, but more RAM) from what I gather.
And yes we all know how to use Google but I don't feel like reviving a thread from January.