mazza558 said:Linky
What would this mean for the Pandora?
since they got a contract with TI to provide drivers, not much i assume?
You'd presume correct. Moreover, it might end up that we have FOSS drivers at that point as Intel's already indicated that it's not changing from it's current driver position any time soon.Racemaniac said:since they got a contract with TI to provide drivers, not much i assume?
Contrary to what people might believe, Intel buying ImgTech would be the best thing ever. Not only about FOSS, but maybe they could mix hot ImgTech patents with their Larrabee monster.mali said:Pandora and SGX is out of the question anyway. I'm just thinking about the future. Imgtech is not the only one who makes efficient GPUs any more. That multicore mali is really interesting. Maybe someone will license it for a Cortex A9 SoC
mali said:I'm much more interested in this, anyway:
http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/gra...i_hardware.html
http://www.arm.com/miscPDFs/21863.pdf
And the Nvidia Tegra is very interesting as well:
http://www.nvidia.com/page/handheld.html
I :lol:ed when I first heard about the GPU called mali :lol:timofonic said:I'm really tired of all the closed source drivers, it doesn't makes sense even in propietary operating systems at all. I hope Gallium3D will make driver development lots easier too.
(I found quite funny your nickname being the same as the name of the ARM's GPU )