I assume you are all familiar with Rule 34?

[htl2001]

I remember a while back reading that, the "exists" part must be taken very broadly for the rule to work, for instance, it would exist in someone's mind even if they never created a physical/digital/other representation of it. I think this was in response to people posting some requests for very odd combos that may have existed, but would take a while to find & there were a lot of such requests, so someone ranted about how rule 34 is not an obligation to make/find content on the internet about what you mention


I think I know too much on this subject maybe...

 

[Blue Protoman]

Please don't tell me your knowledge is first-hand.

 

[Alpha2]

Remember: No porn of OP team members

Pictures of the team with Pandoras are already geek porn.

 

[ZXDunny]

I always thought these "tan" things were quite creepy - obviously drawn by blokes, ones that have no idea of what a real woman is actually like, and drawn to accentuate the bits those blokes find the most attractive (ie, they're sad and lonely) purely so they can then look at their "ideal woman" images with huge baby-like eyes and out-sized boobs and masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.


Fans of these images appear to be identical to the artists, but just haven't drawn any unrealistic women yet.


And you all know that the reason these women have large eyes is to appeal to your parental instincts, yes? In other words, by wanking to these images you're actually indulging your paedophilic tendencies.


That's my opinion, anyway - enjoy your "tans".


D.

 

[lulzfish]

masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.

I hadn't thought of that, but it sounds like a good idea now.

 

[DaMummy]

I always thought these "tan" things were quite creepy - obviously drawn by blokes, ones that have no idea of what a real woman is actually like, and drawn to accentuate the bits those blokes find the most attractive (ie, they're sad and lonely) purely so they can then look at their "ideal woman" images with huge baby-like eyes and out-sized boobs and masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.


Fans of these images appear to be identical to the artists, but just haven't drawn any unrealistic women yet.


And you all know that the reason these women have large eyes is to appeal to your parental instincts, yes? In other words, by wanking to these images you're actually indulging your paedophilic tendencies.


That's my opinion, anyway - enjoy your "tans".


D.

no homo, but id love to see you masturbate to betty white, or a "real woman". for you to not have sexual fantasies means theres something wrong with you, and not us, regardless or not if we do or dont like these "tans". believe what you want, these "real women" have fantasy men as well, but i do believe that theres a problem with people who cant distinct reality and fantasy

 

[craigix]

I always thought these "tan" things were quite creepy - obviously drawn by blokes, ones that have no idea of what a real woman is actually like, and drawn to accentuate the bits those blokes find the most attractive (ie, they're sad and lonely) purely so they can then look at their "ideal woman" images with huge baby-like eyes and out-sized boobs and masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.


Fans of these images appear to be identical to the artists, but just haven't drawn any unrealistic women yet.


And you all know that the reason these women have large eyes is to appeal to your parental instincts, yes? In other words, by wanking to these images you're actually indulging your paedophilic tendencies.


That's my opinion, anyway - enjoy your "tans".


D.

I don't really have any idea what this is about but I now have an overwhelming urge to listen to the smiths.


Spotify!The Smiths/How soon is now.

 

[Rygiz]

I always thought these "tan" things were quite creepy - obviously drawn by blokes, ones that have no idea of what a real woman is actually like, and drawn to accentuate the bits those blokes find the most attractive (ie, they're sad and lonely) purely so they can then look at their "ideal woman" images with huge baby-like eyes and out-sized boobs and masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.


Fans of these images appear to be identical to the artists, but just haven't drawn any unrealistic women yet.


And you all know that the reason these women have large eyes is to appeal to your parental instincts, yes? In other words, by wanking to these images you're actually indulging your paedophilic tendencies.


That's my opinion, anyway - enjoy your "tans".


D.

no homo, but id love to see you masturbate to betty white, or a "real woman". for you to not have sexual fantasies means theres something wrong with you, and not us, regardless or not if we do or dont like these "tans". believe what you want, these "real women" have fantasy men as well, but i do believe that theres a problem with people who cant distinct reality and fantasy

Sooo...This means you do masturbate to tans?


To each their own.


Edit:


I should also point out that rule 35 states:


"If there is not porn of it, porn will be made of it"

 

[DaMummy]

no i dont masturbate to these "tan" things, as a matter of fact, ive never even heard of them until this thread, besides, were in an age where 24mbps connections are available, like they are to me, and theres a reason playboy is tits-deep in dept

 

[ZXDunny]

I always thought these "tan" things were quite creepy - obviously drawn by blokes, ones that have no idea of what a real woman is actually like, and drawn to accentuate the bits those blokes find the most attractive (ie, they're sad and lonely) purely so they can then look at their "ideal woman" images with huge baby-like eyes and out-sized boobs and masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.


Fans of these images appear to be identical to the artists, but just haven't drawn any unrealistic women yet.


And you all know that the reason these women have large eyes is to appeal to your parental instincts, yes? In other words, by wanking to these images you're actually indulging your paedophilic tendencies.


That's my opinion, anyway - enjoy your "tans".


D.

no homo, but id love to see you masturbate to betty white, or a "real woman". for you to not have sexual fantasies means theres something wrong with you, and not us, regardless or not if we do or dont like these "tans". believe what you want, these "real women" have fantasy men as well, but i do believe that theres a problem with people who cant distinct reality and fantasy

Um. Way to completely misread. But what-ho - I would just like to say that I do have "fantasies", but they don't involve cartoon characters that have been drawn with the intention of appealing to paedophiles. If they (Tans, manga/anime girls in general) weren't drawn to be attractive to those with sexual tastes that run to the under-12s, they'd not be drawn in what is predominantly school-kit or have eyes that large.


Just sayin' like.


And Craig: Nice taste in music, that man.


D.

 

[lulzfish]

cartoon characters that have been drawn with the intention of appealing to paedophiles.

Oh, I didn't realize you were getting at that.


Of course that's creepy.


I was thinking of the adult Pandora-tan that had normal eyes and was clearly not a child or teenager. And I was joking about masturbating to it. I feel like I would offend the artist or something. And I don't do that anyway, because it's weird.


But I guess that would be Pandora-san? I don't know the honorifics but somehow "tan" (which is a corruption of "chan", I think) got co-opted to mean something like a cartoon mascot. So if you like, it could also mean adult-looking mascots. Grammar is flexible in some cases.

 

[DaMummy]

I always thought these "tan" things were quite creepy - obviously drawn by blokes, ones that have no idea of what a real woman is actually like, and drawn to accentuate the bits those blokes find the most attractive (ie, they're sad and lonely) purely so they can then look at their "ideal woman" images with huge baby-like eyes and out-sized boobs and masturbate furiously in their darkened bedrooms.


Fans of these images appear to be identical to the artists, but just haven't drawn any unrealistic women yet.


And you all know that the reason these women have large eyes is to appeal to your parental instincts, yes? In other words, by wanking to these images you're actually indulging your paedophilic tendencies.


That's my opinion, anyway - enjoy your "tans".


D.

no homo, but id love to see you masturbate to betty white, or a "real woman". for you to not have sexual fantasies means theres something wrong with you, and not us, regardless or not if we do or dont like these "tans". believe what you want, these "real women" have fantasy men as well, but i do believe that theres a problem with people who cant distinct reality and fantasy

Um. Way to completely misread. But what-ho - I would just like to say that I do have "fantasies", but they don't involve cartoon characters that have been drawn with the intention of appealing to paedophiles. If they (Tans, manga/anime girls in general) weren't drawn to be attractive to those with sexual tastes that run to the under-12s, they'd not be drawn in what is predominantly school-kit or have eyes that large.


Just sayin' like.


And Craig: Nice taste in music, that man.


D.

then again, who are you to say that these "tan"'s are supposed to be some sort of sex object, just cause somebody draws a female character doesnt instantly make it a sex character, at least not to everyone and possibly the artists themselves, just cause you think laura croft might be a sex object, doesnt mean everyone does, besides, id rather have pedophiles looking at these cartoons, whatever they may imply(is the the word im looking for?)than at real 12 year olds, anyway im getting completely off topic here.....no wait this is partially the topic...CARRY ON!