Dead1nside
Well-Known Member
I agree with the sentiment that there may be better devices for a person's usage scenario. For my particular set, I think the Pandora's transcending a lot of the traditional device segments. I firmly agree that this is what a netbook wishes it was. The only advantage of a netbook is more power (because of size) and a bigger screen. The Pandora however is the best for its size and that's not even exploring its other uses, namely gaming.
I can play Quake 3 on my phone if I want to, a Nokia N82. Does it mean it's a good experience? No; the screen's only 2.4' and the resolution is crappy, also despite having an OMAP2 it's just too underpowered for games and has no control scheme apart from inaccurate-shaking using the accelerometer. Phones are getting more powerful, using similar chips to Pandora's, if not better. However they still don't have a D-Pad, buttons and analog sticks. The industry-consumer penchant for touch screen devices also means that's not likely to change.
I am very interested in the N900 myself, however it's proven that the battery life just doesn't do anything for me. It would be a step backwards for me, in this respect. I've had a phone that only lasted a day, it's not ideal. The open nature of development has been really good for the N900, there's a lot of creativity and applications around. However there are still major closed off elements, the Calendar front-end etc. Why bother will all the hoop jumping? Why bother trying to hack a PSP2 when you can get a Pandora?
I'm to this day amazed how well the Pandora ticks all the boxes for me, large high-res screen, good battery life, gaming controls, good connectivity options (wi-fi, usb host, bluetooth), usable hardware keyboard, won't weigh down my bag.
I can play Quake 3 on my phone if I want to, a Nokia N82. Does it mean it's a good experience? No; the screen's only 2.4' and the resolution is crappy, also despite having an OMAP2 it's just too underpowered for games and has no control scheme apart from inaccurate-shaking using the accelerometer. Phones are getting more powerful, using similar chips to Pandora's, if not better. However they still don't have a D-Pad, buttons and analog sticks. The industry-consumer penchant for touch screen devices also means that's not likely to change.
I am very interested in the N900 myself, however it's proven that the battery life just doesn't do anything for me. It would be a step backwards for me, in this respect. I've had a phone that only lasted a day, it's not ideal. The open nature of development has been really good for the N900, there's a lot of creativity and applications around. However there are still major closed off elements, the Calendar front-end etc. Why bother will all the hoop jumping? Why bother trying to hack a PSP2 when you can get a Pandora?
I'm to this day amazed how well the Pandora ticks all the boxes for me, large high-res screen, good battery life, gaming controls, good connectivity options (wi-fi, usb host, bluetooth), usable hardware keyboard, won't weigh down my bag.
Last edited by a moderator: